2019
DOI: 10.1002/mp.13662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of a model for physical dose variations in irregularly moving targets treated with carbon ion beams

Abstract: Purpose In particle therapy, conventional treatment planning systems rely on an imaging representation of the irradiated region to compute the dose. For irregular breathing, when an imaging dataset describing the actual motion is not available, a different approach for dose estimation is needed. To this aim, we validate a method for the estimation of physical dose variations in gated carbon ion treatments, providing also a demonstration of the feasibility of physical dose metrics to assess the method performan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The applied method, which does not need time-resolved imaging, being based on reference 3D CT and dose distribution, allowed us to estimate with appropriate accuracy the 4D RWD. Indeed, for all simulations the median estimation error on D 5% and D 95% was ≤5%, obtaining results comparable to Meschini et al 18 In the patient study, a clinically acceptable plan was optimized, with a robust beam configuration 44 and proper tumor margins. 21,24 Simulations entailed irradiation during free breathing in order to evaluate the bioWED method in unfavorable conditions, although in carbon ion therapy pancreatic patients are usually treated with the gating technique combined with other motion mitigation strategies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The applied method, which does not need time-resolved imaging, being based on reference 3D CT and dose distribution, allowed us to estimate with appropriate accuracy the 4D RWD. Indeed, for all simulations the median estimation error on D 5% and D 95% was ≤5%, obtaining results comparable to Meschini et al 18 In the patient study, a clinically acceptable plan was optimized, with a robust beam configuration 44 and proper tumor margins. 21,24 Simulations entailed irradiation during free breathing in order to evaluate the bioWED method in unfavorable conditions, although in carbon ion therapy pancreatic patients are usually treated with the gating technique combined with other motion mitigation strategies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…For each considered respiratory phase φ, the dp,φEE, αp,φEE, and βp,φEE maps were used to estimate with the bioWED method the dp,φ, αp,φ, and βp,φ needed for italicRBE estimation, as previously done for physical dose estimations 17,18 . Specifically, both the planning end‐exhale CT and the maps were transformed in the beam‐ and patient‐specific WED‐space and translated according to tumor motion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the abdominal site, motion correlated treatment planning relies on a 4DCT with four respiratory phases: the endexhale, used for plan optimization; the 30%-exhale and 30%inhale, to test the plan against residual motion within the gating window; the end-inhale, to assess the total range of motion. 34,35 The MRI scan was performed on the same day of the 4DCT acquisition. For 4 of the eight patients, two 4DMRI were acquired within the same session.…”
Section: B Patient Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%