2017
DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2016.2599779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of a Multimodality Flow Phantom and Its Application for Assessment of Dynamic SPECT and PET Technologies

Abstract: Simple and robust techniques are lacking to assess performance of flow quantification using dynamic imaging. We therefore developed a method to qualify flow quantification technologies using a physical compartment exchange phantom and image analysis tool. We validate and demonstrate utility of this method using dynamic PET and SPECT. Dynamic image sequences were acquired on two PET/CT and a cardiac dedicated SPECT (with and without attenuation and scatter corrections) systems. A two-compartment exchange model … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To this end, Driscoll and colleagues proposed a phantom simulating two‐compartmental exchange for dynamic contrast‐enhanced (DCE) imaging 20 . The phantom was shown to generate reproducible signal intensity‐time (SI) curves during first‐pass perfusion experiments with computed tomography (CT), PET, and single‐photon emission CT and is currently the only commercially available phantom of its kind 20,21 . Nevertheless, the phantom does not include a full heart model, generates a homogeneous flow distribution within the myocardium, and has not yet been used with MRI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To this end, Driscoll and colleagues proposed a phantom simulating two‐compartmental exchange for dynamic contrast‐enhanced (DCE) imaging 20 . The phantom was shown to generate reproducible signal intensity‐time (SI) curves during first‐pass perfusion experiments with computed tomography (CT), PET, and single‐photon emission CT and is currently the only commercially available phantom of its kind 20,21 . Nevertheless, the phantom does not include a full heart model, generates a homogeneous flow distribution within the myocardium, and has not yet been used with MRI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the phantom lacks diversity in capillary size and its low manufacturing reproducibility potentially hampers its commercialization. Both aforementioned phantoms have proven useful in the assessment of perfusion methodologies, but their design limits their use to the measurement of spatially homogeneous perfusion rate and, therefore, allow only global perfusion validation 5,21,23‐25 . Others proposed the use of a real perfused heart in a hardware phantom for physiological perfusion experiments, though the sacrifice of large animals, its high costs, and complicated pre‐scan preparations preclude routine use in the clinic 15,26 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Using pumps to control the flow of radioactivity into and out of compartments in the phantom, it is possible to simulate the kinetic behavior found in MBF studies. 8,9 To date, these phantoms have provided time-varying activity within stationary structures and have been criticized for their lack of anatomical realism and their neglect of physiologic cardiac and respiratory motion. Phantoms also have previously been developed to explore the accuracy of ECG-gated SPECT imaging at measuring myocardial volumes and ejection fractions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%