2013
DOI: 10.11114/jets.v1i2.126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of a Paper-and-Pencil Test Instrument Measuring Biology Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge by Using Think-Aloud Interviews

Abstract: The topic of ‗teacher professionalism' is one of the most crucial ones in quality education research. It has a potential to generate results that could inform and hence enhance the practice in classrooms. Thus, research in this field needs reliable instruments to measure the professional knowledge of our teachers to be able to generate reliable results for our research problems. Not many instruments have been developed with regard to this topic. At the same time, an adequate validation of the instrument develo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such concerns cannot be rejected a priori; they must be empirically investigated by further validity checks. However, Jüttner and Neuhaus () found that results obtained using their instrument may be comparable, despite differences in language and culture, indicating that our instrument may also have at least adequate cross‐setting validity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such concerns cannot be rejected a priori; they must be empirically investigated by further validity checks. However, Jüttner and Neuhaus () found that results obtained using their instrument may be comparable, despite differences in language and culture, indicating that our instrument may also have at least adequate cross‐setting validity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Studies available so far, refer to most one topic of school biology lessons, such as Ecology, Genetics (Kirschner et al, ), or Evolution (Großschedl, Neubrand, et al, ) to capture corresponding specific aspects of teachers' PCK. In a respective topic‐specific manner, studies are reported, for example, by van Dijk and Kattmann (), Schmelzing et al () and Jüttner and Neuhaus (). Hence, a comprehensive, multidisciplinary and biology‐specific instrument is highly desirable, to acquire insights.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different characteristics and abilities are described to be necessary for effective teaching [4]. Currently, the aspect of professional knowledge is an emphasized object of research (e.g., [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]). However, being an effective teacher takes more than just having professional knowledge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CK part of the test (12 items) included open-ended and multiple-choice items on neurobiology and cytology. The validity of both knowledge tests was determined by contrast-groups comparisons [66] and think-aloud interviews [67]. In contrast-group comparisons between biology secondary school teachers, certified biologists and certified pedagogues, it was found that the biology secondary school teachers performed significantly higher in the developed PCK test than did both the certified biologists and certified pedagogues [67].…”
Section: Domain-specific Knowledge Dimensions Pck and Ckmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The validity of both knowledge tests was determined by contrast-groups comparisons [66] and think-aloud interviews [67]. In contrast-group comparisons between biology secondary school teachers, certified biologists and certified pedagogues, it was found that the biology secondary school teachers performed significantly higher in the developed PCK test than did both the certified biologists and certified pedagogues [67]. Additionally, a high content validity for the PCK items was examined by think-aloud interviews with German and American biology teachers [66].…”
Section: Domain-specific Knowledge Dimensions Pck and Ckmentioning
confidence: 99%