Study Objectives:We hypothesized that a dual-channel portable monitor (PM) device could accurately identify patients who have a high pretest probability of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and we evaluated factors that may contribute to variability between PM and polysomnography (PSG) results. Methods: Consecutive clinic patients (N = 104) with possible OSA completed a home PM study, a PM study simultaneous with laboratory PSG, and a second home PM study. Uniform data analysis methods were applied to both PM and PSG data. Primary outcomes of interest were the positive likelihood ratio (LR+) and sensitivity of the PM device to "rule-in" OSA, defi ned as an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 5 events/h on PSG. Effects of different test environment and study nights, and order of study and analysis methods (manual compared to automated) on PM diagnostic accuracy were assessed. Results: The PM has adequate LR+ (4.8), sensitivity (80%), and specifi city (83%) for detecting OSA in the unattended home setting when benchmarked against laboratory PSG, with better LR+ (> 5) and specifi city (100%) and unchanged sensitivity (80%) in the simultaneous laboratory comparison. There were no signifi cant night-night (all p > 0.10) or study order effects (home or laboratory fi rst, p = 0.08) on AHI measures. Manual PM data review improved case fi nding accuracy, although this was not statistically signifi cant (all p > 0.07). Misclassifi cation was more frequent where OSA was mild. Conclusions: Overall performance of the PM device is consistent with current recommended criteria for an "acceptable" device to confi dently "rule-in" OSA (AHI ≥ 5 events/h) in a high pretest probability clinic population. Our data support the utility of simple two-channel diagnostic devices to confi rm the diagnosis of OSA in the home environment.