2019
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz1334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of a temperate fourth planet in the K2-133 multiplanet system

Abstract: We present follow-up observations of the K2-133 multi-planet system. Previously, we announced that K2-133 contained three super-Earths orbiting an M1.5V host starwith tentative evidence of a fourth outer-planet orbiting at the edge of the temperate zone. Here we report on the validation of the presence of the fourth planet, determining a radius of 1.73 +0.14 −0.13 R ⊕ . The four planets span the radius gap of the exoplanet population, meaning further follow-up would be worthwhile to obtain masses and test theo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 57 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a final step, we run the free and open source validation tool vespa (Morton 2012 to evaluate the false positive probability (FPP) of DS Tuc A b in a Bayesian framework. vespa has been widely used (e.g., Montet et al 2015;Crossfield et al 2016;Malavolta et al 2018;Mayo et al 2018;Wells et al 2019) to estimate the probability that a given signal is actually produced by a real planet and not the result of different astrophysical configurations. As reported in Morton (2012), the false positive scenarios explored by vespa are: i) a non-associated back/foreground eclipsing binary blended inside the photometric aperture of the target (BEB), ii) a hierarchical triple system where two components eclipse (HEB), iii) an eclipsing binary (EB), iv) a non-associated blended back/foreground star hosting a transiting planet (Bpl).…”
Section: False Positive Probabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a final step, we run the free and open source validation tool vespa (Morton 2012 to evaluate the false positive probability (FPP) of DS Tuc A b in a Bayesian framework. vespa has been widely used (e.g., Montet et al 2015;Crossfield et al 2016;Malavolta et al 2018;Mayo et al 2018;Wells et al 2019) to estimate the probability that a given signal is actually produced by a real planet and not the result of different astrophysical configurations. As reported in Morton (2012), the false positive scenarios explored by vespa are: i) a non-associated back/foreground eclipsing binary blended inside the photometric aperture of the target (BEB), ii) a hierarchical triple system where two components eclipse (HEB), iii) an eclipsing binary (EB), iv) a non-associated blended back/foreground star hosting a transiting planet (Bpl).…”
Section: False Positive Probabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%