2013
DOI: 10.1179/1465313312y.0000000009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of conventional 2D lateral cephalometry using 3D cone beam CT

Abstract: Measurements used in the Eastman cephalometric analysis derived from 2D cephalometric lateral skull images are comparable to those derived from 3D CBCT images.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Measurement of soft-tissue models obtained from CBCTor CT imaging using Mimics has been confirmed as a valid method in various studies [ 49 , 50 ]. Correlation of the initial measurements and follow-up measurements in the present study also showed that the measurement method is extremely accurate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurement of soft-tissue models obtained from CBCTor CT imaging using Mimics has been confirmed as a valid method in various studies [ 49 , 50 ]. Correlation of the initial measurements and follow-up measurements in the present study also showed that the measurement method is extremely accurate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference can be justified by the fact that the measurements obtained from the 2D technique determine a projection of the points, which in reality are placed on different planes. Differently, the planes measured using the 3D technique are based on a real measurement (an oblique plane on the sagittal axis) rather than prospective ones [68]. Hence, the real measurement for the two-dimensional technique is represented by its projection with the consequent result that measurements obtained from the 2D radiographs are less accurate than the ones obtained from the 3D radiographs [19, 20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CBCT exposes patients to greater radiation doses than conventional lateral cephalograms [4447] and therefore its application in the context of cross-sectional studies is not ethically justifiable. Furthermore, conventional lateral cephalograms and those derived from 3D CBCTs demonstrated no significant differences in most linear and angular cephalometric measurements [4850] and more specifically in the UAS area [51]. Linear 2D cephalometric measurements relate well to three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging measurements [52].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%