2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2011.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of Echocardiographic Left Atrial Parameters in Atrial Fibrillation Using the Index Beat of Preceding Cardiac Cycles of Equal Duration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, it is timeconsuming and not realistic in the clinical scenario to analyze more than 10 beats for evaluating left ventricular performance. Prior studies have found that the left ventricular systolic and atrial parameters measured from index beat are reasonable estimates of the measured average values over all cardiac cycles [20][21][22]. In the present study, we also demonstrated that using the index beat to measure PEPa-derived MPI was as accurate as and less timeconsuming than the onerous method of averaging of multiple cardiac cycles.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, it is timeconsuming and not realistic in the clinical scenario to analyze more than 10 beats for evaluating left ventricular performance. Prior studies have found that the left ventricular systolic and atrial parameters measured from index beat are reasonable estimates of the measured average values over all cardiac cycles [20][21][22]. In the present study, we also demonstrated that using the index beat to measure PEPa-derived MPI was as accurate as and less timeconsuming than the onerous method of averaging of multiple cardiac cycles.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Because their measurements using average method were time-consuming, many echocardiographic parameters including left ventricular dimensions, LVEF, LAVI, LVMI, PEPa, ETa, IVRTa, and PEPa-derived MPI were not obtained from the averaging multiple cardiac cycles, but measured from the index beat. However, several studies including the present one had proven use of the index beat to measure certain echocardiographic parameters including left ventricular systolic, diastolic, and left atrial parameters in patients with AF was as accurate as the time-consuming method of averaging multiple cardiac cycles [20][21][22]. The majority of our patients were treated chronically with antihypertensive or anti-thrombosis medications.…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…58,94 The averaging remains crucial for systolic as for diastolic function parameters assessment; however, other approaches have been proposed. 95 The 'index beat' method uses the measurement performed on the cardiac cycle following a pair of equal preceding cardiac cycles. If atrial fibrillation duration is >48 h or there is doubt about its duration, TOE can be used to rule out intracardiac thrombus prior to cardioversion.…”
Section: Atrial Arrhythmiasmentioning
confidence: 99%