2013
DOI: 10.1017/s1751731112001218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of fatty acid predictions in milk using mid-infrared spectrometry across cattle breeds

Abstract: The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy to predict detailed fatty acid (FA) composition of bovine milk by mid-infrared spectrometry, for a cattle population that partly differed in terms of country, breed and methodology used to measure actual FA composition compared with the calibration data set. Calibration equations for predicting FA composition using mid-infrared spectrometry were developed in the European project RobustMilk and based on 1236 milk samples from multiple cattle breeds from Irel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
46
2
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
6
46
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…By selecting the same number of samples according to spectral variability, adopting a mathematical pretreatment of spectral data before PLS, and selecting only a quarter of the FTIR spectrum, Soyeurt et al (2011) improved the calibration R 2 values to 0.91, 0.58, 0.92, and 0.87, and the validation R 2 values to 0.90, 0.50, 0.86, and 0.74, respectively, for the 4 FA. By applying PLS to the first derivative of spectral data of 1,236 analyzed samples to predict the amounts of the same 4 FA in milk, Maurice-Van Eijndhoven et al (2013) obtained R 2 values of 0.96, 0.80, 0.98, and 0.91 from calibration, and of 0.85 to 0.94, 0.64 to 0.80, 0.86 to 0.93, and 0.58 to 0.80 from validation, according to the breed of cow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By selecting the same number of samples according to spectral variability, adopting a mathematical pretreatment of spectral data before PLS, and selecting only a quarter of the FTIR spectrum, Soyeurt et al (2011) improved the calibration R 2 values to 0.91, 0.58, 0.92, and 0.87, and the validation R 2 values to 0.90, 0.50, 0.86, and 0.74, respectively, for the 4 FA. By applying PLS to the first derivative of spectral data of 1,236 analyzed samples to predict the amounts of the same 4 FA in milk, Maurice-Van Eijndhoven et al (2013) obtained R 2 values of 0.96, 0.80, 0.98, and 0.91 from calibration, and of 0.85 to 0.94, 0.64 to 0.80, 0.86 to 0.93, and 0.58 to 0.80 from validation, according to the breed of cow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have investigated the potential use of MIR spectroscopy to predict MFA composition in dairy cattle, which have been extensively reviewed by De Marchi et al In general, these studies find a clear relationship between MFA concentration (g 100 g −1 FA) and the accuracy of the MIR spectroscopy prediction models; the accuracy of the MIR spectroscopy prediction models for major MFA is higher compared with minor MFA. The accuracy of MIR spectroscopy prediction models is also higher for individual saturated fatty acids (SFA) than individual UFA.…”
Section: Mid‐infrared To Measure Milk Fatty Acidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The definition of the groups of FA are given in Table 1 and some descriptive statistics of the calibration equations, which are described by Soyeurt et al (2011), are given in Table 2. More detailed descriptive statistics of the calibration equations are published by Maurice-Van Eijndhoven et al (2012) including an external validation for the MRY breed.…”
Section: Measuring Fatty Acid Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%