37th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit 2001
DOI: 10.2514/6.2001-3986
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of Hall thruster plume sputter model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For each combination of incident and target materials, the sputtered material and the sputtering model with appropriate coefficients can be specified in the input file. Currently, seven different models for total sputter yield are implemented: the constant yield model and models by Matsunami et al, 15 Yamamura and Tawara, 16 Kannenberg et al, 17 Roussel et al, 18 Garnier et al, 19 and Pencil et al 20 Yamamura and Tawara's model is the most general and agrees fairly well with many combination of source and target materials. Examples of sputtering yield curves as functions of energy and angle are shown in Fig.…”
Section: E Particle-surface Interactionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For each combination of incident and target materials, the sputtered material and the sputtering model with appropriate coefficients can be specified in the input file. Currently, seven different models for total sputter yield are implemented: the constant yield model and models by Matsunami et al, 15 Yamamura and Tawara, 16 Kannenberg et al, 17 Roussel et al, 18 Garnier et al, 19 and Pencil et al 20 Yamamura and Tawara's model is the most general and agrees fairly well with many combination of source and target materials. Examples of sputtering yield curves as functions of energy and angle are shown in Fig.…”
Section: E Particle-surface Interactionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These processes present a complex spacecraft interaction problem of determining where net erosion or net deposition of material will occur. In standard practice the approach to this problem is to use witness plates [1][2][3][4]. Typically witness plates are placed downstream of a thruster at different angular positions in ground-based test facilities to determine the relative importance of the competing effects of (1) sputter rates caused by energetic plume ions and (2) deposition rates caused by sputtered thruster materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At Space Systems Loral (SS/L), a detailed SPT-100 HET plume model has been developed that incorporates ion current density, ion energy and sputter yield data. Among several other capabilities this model has the ability to calculate net erosion or net thruster material deposition rates at points of interest on a given satellite [1][2][3][4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many experimental and modeling studies have been performed for Hall thruster plumes 43,44,45,46 and also for EP missions beyond GEO. 47,48 The plume of the BPT-4000 thruster has been characterized through detailed diagnostic experiments, 49 materials sputter testing and modeling, 50 and spacecraft-level plume effects modeling. 51 Plume effects depend in part on the specific thruster used but also importantly on the spacecraft configuration.…”
Section: Mission Assurancementioning
confidence: 99%