2008
DOI: 10.1080/01431160701772526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of high‐resolution satellite rainfall products over complex terrain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

19
258
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 369 publications
(279 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
19
258
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noteworthy that topography and climate conditions clearly influence the accuracy of retrieval results [38,39]. Our results also supported this view.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…It is noteworthy that topography and climate conditions clearly influence the accuracy of retrieval results [38,39]. Our results also supported this view.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…HOSCILO et al data (at 0.25 ∘ spatial resolution) estimated rainfall particularly well for Zimbabwe and Ethiopia (r 2 = 0.7). The RFE 1.0 product performed better than RFE 2.0 over Ethiopia, however RFE 2.0 was slightly better than RFE 1.0 over Zimbabwe (Dinku et al, 2008). A study by Beyene and Meissner (2010) also showed a good correlation between monthly RFE 1.0 and RFE 2.0 data (January to December 1996December -2006 and weather station rainfall records in Ethiopia (r 2 > 0.5 and 0.75 depending on the month).…”
Section: Rainfall Datamentioning
confidence: 73%
“…However, RFE underestimates rainfall during peak rainy seasons and overestimates in other seasons (Laws et al, 2004), with an average bias of −0.15 mm day −1 (NOAA/CPC, 2002). Few validation studies indicate estimates of errors for different locations in Africa and over different time periods (Laws et al, 2004;Dinku et al, 2008). However, we cannot extrapolate 8 N. M. Velpuri: A multi-source satellite data approach for modelling Lake Turkana water level these errors for the Lake Turkana basin due to its complexity.…”
Section: Uncertainties In Llm Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Errors in other parameters such as rainfall, runoff, and ET would critically affect modelling results. Validation of RFE rainfall over the Ethiopian highlands using gauge data suggested that RFE can be reliably used for early warning systems to empower the decision making (Dinku et al, 2008). However, RFE underestimates rainfall during peak rainy seasons and overestimates in other seasons (Laws et al, 2004), with an average bias of −0.15 mm day −1 (NOAA/CPC, 2002).…”
Section: Uncertainties In Llm Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%