1981
DOI: 10.1097/00003072-198109001-00024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of Nuclide Gastric Emptying Tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is evident that the discrepancy becomes higher as the energy of the meal increases. The calculated T50s using scintigraphy for liquid meals with the same energy load, as in this study, are comparable with those found in the literature (Elashoff et al 1982, VanDeventer et al 1983, Christian et al 1980. For interpretation of the shorter T50s given by EIE direct simple comparison of the data given by both methods was carried out.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…It is evident that the discrepancy becomes higher as the energy of the meal increases. The calculated T50s using scintigraphy for liquid meals with the same energy load, as in this study, are comparable with those found in the literature (Elashoff et al 1982, VanDeventer et al 1983, Christian et al 1980. For interpretation of the shorter T50s given by EIE direct simple comparison of the data given by both methods was carried out.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…We have not only attempted to standardize our examination technique but have also chosen a test design that simulates a normal meal in a seated position, enabling us to believe that our system is both reproducible and a natural stimulus for the digestion process after consumption of food. Correction for geometry and radionuclide decay has not been regarded as necessary because of the small size of the gastric pouches (12) and the short examination time (1 h) in relation to the half-life of technetium (6 h). The stability of the radioactive labelling of the food is naturally of great importance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A region of interest around the stomach was manually drawn, allowing measurement of counts in the region of interest and total abdomen. These counts were then corrected for down scatter, septal penetration, and decay using equations generated by previous phantom studies with the 2 isotopes [30]. In aStandard and pylorus denote patients undergoing either the standard or pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy.…”
Section: Gastric Emptying Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%