2011
DOI: 10.5194/amt-4-1541-2011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of refractivity profiles derived from GRAS raw-sampling data

Abstract: Abstract.Results from GRAS (GNSS Receiver for Atmospheric Sounding) RO (Radio Occultation) data recorded in RS (Raw Sampling) mode processed at the GFZ (German Research Centre for Geoscience) Potsdam are presented. The experimental processing software POCS-X includes FSI (Full Spectrum Inversion) in order to cope with multi-path regions and enables in connection with RS data to retrieve atmospheric refractivity profiles down to the Earths surface. Radio occultation events observed between 30 September and 30 O… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the statistical results of the rising and setting occultations of GNOS GPS, the standard deviation of the rising and setting differs up to ∼ 0.5 %. The small positive bias between 2 and 6 km in the setting occultations is identical to the result of Zus et al (2011), which used the MetOp/GRAS refractivity and ECMWF reanalysis. As for GNOS BDS, the penetration depths of the rising and setting occultations are both higher than the depths of GNOS GPS, especially in the rising occultation, whose valid height completely stops at ∼ 3 km.…”
Section: Performance In Lower Troposphere With and Without Open-loop supporting
confidence: 62%
“…From the statistical results of the rising and setting occultations of GNOS GPS, the standard deviation of the rising and setting differs up to ∼ 0.5 %. The small positive bias between 2 and 6 km in the setting occultations is identical to the result of Zus et al (2011), which used the MetOp/GRAS refractivity and ECMWF reanalysis. As for GNOS BDS, the penetration depths of the rising and setting occultations are both higher than the depths of GNOS GPS, especially in the rising occultation, whose valid height completely stops at ∼ 3 km.…”
Section: Performance In Lower Troposphere With and Without Open-loop supporting
confidence: 62%
“…In our simulation the fractional refractivity error variance is chosen to be 1% and the vertical correlation length is chosen to be 500 m. Note that we perform a simulation study and not an assimilation study (we are concerned with the functionality of the NLM, TLM, and ADJ) such that the choice of the background error covariance matrix is not crucial. The specific choice of 1% for the fractional refractivity error variance is rational insofar as it corresponds to the typical standard deviation between GPS Radio Occultation and NWM refractivity profiles [see, e.g., Zus et al, 2011]. In order to show how the uncertainty in the refractivity field grows away from the single station, we approximate the a posteriori covariance matrix through…”
Section: Minimizing a Cost Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of past and current spacecrafts carry GNSS-RO payloads, e.g. the satellites GPS/Met (Kursinski et al, 1997), CHAMP (Wickert et al, 2001), GRACE Wickert et al, 2005), COSMIC (Anthes et al, 2008), Metop (Luntama et al, 2008;von Engeln et al, 2011;Bonnedal et al, 2010;Zus et al, 2011), TerraSAR-X (Beyerle et al, 2011) and TanDEM-X (Zus et al, 2014a). Already the proof-of-concept mission GPS/Met revealed the difficul-16 G. Beyerle and F. Zus: Low-elevation GPS signal tracking ties of retrieving dual-frequency carrier phase data, when the ray tangent point enters the lower troposphere (Rocken et al, 1997a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%