2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-011-1292-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Medical Outcomes Study-Social Support Survey in Hodgkin's lymphoma survivors

Abstract: Results show good general psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the MOS-SSS when applied to HL survivors. The three-factor structure identified in this study is in line with a previous validation among Brazilian healthy civil servants. The Brazilian Portuguese version will now be used to evaluate social support and its association with long-term disease outcomes and quality of life of Hodgkin's lymphoma survivors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
26
1
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
6
26
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite these differences, all studies found satisfactory model fit for their abbreviated 1-factor measures. The merits of this 6-item measure are that item selection was based on a factor structure applicable to this sample and supported in other studies [6,8] and that it was validated in two large nationally representative samples of women from different age groups making it suitable for population-based research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Despite these differences, all studies found satisfactory model fit for their abbreviated 1-factor measures. The merits of this 6-item measure are that item selection was based on a factor structure applicable to this sample and supported in other studies [6,8] and that it was validated in two large nationally representative samples of women from different age groups making it suitable for population-based research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…It could also be argued that item selection should have been based on the original factor structure, but generalizability of this factor structure has been questioned in several studies [6,8,10,11]. Similarly, instances where language and meaning have taken precedence over item loading may be criticized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finalmente, el hecho de que los estudios en Latinoamérica revisados muestren bastante concordancia en los resultados permite mostrar que el comportamiento de la escala podría ser semejante en distintos países de la región, lo que facilitaría su uso en la práctica en su forma estándar o modificada por nuestro estudio (un ítem menos) 38,41,42 .…”
Section: Conclusiones Utilidad Y Limitacionesunclassified
“…It was originally hypothesized to measure five dimensions of social support: (1) emotional support (expression of positive affect, empathetic understanding, and the encouragement of expressions of feelings); (2) informational support (offering of advice, information, guidance, or feedback); (3) tangible support (provision of material aid or behavioral assistance); (4) positive social interaction (availability of other persons with whom to engage in pleasurable activities); and (5) affectionate support (expressions of love and affection) (Sherbourne & Stewart, 1991). With well-established reliability and validity, the MOS-SSS has been translated into different languages including Portuguese (Griep, Chor, Faerstein, et al, 2005; Soares, Biasoli, Scheliga, et al, 2012), Spanish (Cohen & Wills, 1985; House, Robbins, & Metzner, 1982), French (Anderson, Bilodeau, Deshaies, et al, 2005; Robitaille, Orpana, & McIntosh, 2011), and Malay (Mahmud, Awang, & Mohamed, 2004) and has been well validated among different sub-populations in various countries (Anderson et al, 2005; Cohen & Wills, 1985; Griep et al, 2005; House et al, 1982; Mahmud et al, 2004; Robitaille et al, 2011; Soares et al, 2012). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%