2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05562-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the care providers version of the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care-measurement tool in Chinese primary care systems

Abstract: Background: The original Rainbow Model of Integrated Care Measurement Tool (RMIC-MT) is based on the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care (RMIC), which provides a comprehensive theoretical framework for integrated care. To translate and adapt the original care provider version of the RMIC-MT and evaluate its psychometric properties by a pilot study in Chinese primary care systems. Methods: The translation and adaptation process were performed in four steps, forward and back-translation, experts review and pre-test… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The six key domains provide a framework to characterize the degree of integration from a multifocal perspective. The literature suggests that the RMIC has been well applied to explore and analyse the integration perspectives of different stakeholders’ at different levels in various study settings including Australia [ 19 ], Norway [ 20 ], Singapore [ 21 ], China [ 22 23 24 25 ], etc. Furthermore, Chen Z 2019 have already explored and validated the RMIC in China’s context, which confirmed its adaptation and applicability in China particularly regarding the key domains covered in this model [ 25 ].…”
Section: Theory and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The six key domains provide a framework to characterize the degree of integration from a multifocal perspective. The literature suggests that the RMIC has been well applied to explore and analyse the integration perspectives of different stakeholders’ at different levels in various study settings including Australia [ 19 ], Norway [ 20 ], Singapore [ 21 ], China [ 22 23 24 25 ], etc. Furthermore, Chen Z 2019 have already explored and validated the RMIC in China’s context, which confirmed its adaptation and applicability in China particularly regarding the key domains covered in this model [ 25 ].…”
Section: Theory and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…clinical integration, professional integration, organizational integration, person-centeredness). Differently, care providers participated in validation of the provider version C-RMIC-MT didn't recognize differences between clinical and organizational integration [21]. The personcenteredness dimension did not meet the eigenvalue criteria of >1.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Studiesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Factor 1 was named 'clinical integration' (5 items, 15.29% variance), factor 2 'professional integration' (3 items, 11.02% variance), factor 3 'team-based coordination' (3 items, 9.98% variance), factor 4 'organizational integration' (2 items, 9.44% variance), factor 5 'person-centeredness' (2 items, 7.78% variance). Items 1,11,15,19,20,21,22,23,24 were omitted because they had poor factor loadings (<0.60) (Table 3). Regarding model fit (15 items, five factors), the following test of significance and goodnessof-fit measures were obtained: RMSEA 0.046, SRMR 0.057, CFI 0.896, TLI 0.885.…”
Section: Factor Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Rainbow Model of Integrated Care (RMIC) is becoming internationally recognized for integrated care as a suitable theoretical framework [7] (Valentijn 2016). Although RMIC measurement tools have been used to assess coordination capabilities within certain diseases [7][8][9][10][11] there is still a need for an evaluation model at the regional level that meets the evaluation needs in the region analyzed in this exercise. Researchers have applied the theory of synergy on local and international scenarios [12,13] to study regional medical resources [14], public health services [15], the retirement pension service supply [16], and a combination of medical and nursing services [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%