Validation of the Chinese version of Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE) in an adolescent general population

Mark, Winifred; Toulopoulou, Timothea

doi:10.1016/j.ajp.2017.01.012

Cited by 33 publications

(28 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A composite score was created by the sum of these items (maximum score = 15, Cronbach's αWhite = .64, Cronbach's αAsian = .67). The original 42-item measure has been validated in a Western context in various samples in Europe, Canada, North America and Australia (for a meta-analysis see Mark & Toulopoulou, 2016) as well as China with 15 items (Mark & Toulopoulou, 2017 Contact intentions with people with a mental health problem (Tam et al, 2009) were measured using nine items on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 = not at all to 7 = very much, for example "I would keep them at a distance". Items were recoded so that higher values indicate higher intentions.…”

Section: Similar Scales Measuring Outgroup Contact Have Been Used In mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…South Asians in the United Kingdom may be different to South Asians living in their home countries (Berry, 1997(Berry, , 2003. Longer versions have been validated in Western (Mark & Toulopoulou, 2016) and non-Western (Mark & Toulopoulou, 2017) cultures, indicating that it is a robust instrument capturing psychotic experiences across cultures, and similar questionnaires have been used to capture symptoms of South Asians in the United Kingdom. A fruitful avenue for future research would be the development of scales that are able to capture the culture-specific experiences of mental health, and that are developed with researchers and service-users from non-Western cultures.…”

Section: Cultural Differences In Psychosis 20mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Cultural Differences in Psychosis: The Role of Causal Beliefs and Stigma in White British and South Asians

Mirza¹,

Birtel

Pyle³

et al. 2019

Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Similar Scales Measuring Outgroup Contact Have Been Used In mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Cultural Differences In Psychosis 20mentioning

confidence: 99%

Cultural Differences in Psychosis: The Role of Causal Beliefs and Stigma in White British and South Asians

Mirza¹,

Birtel

Pyle³

et al. 2019

Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Another important future research direction is to examine the clinical utility and validity of the Indonesian CAPE. There have been evidence that the CAPE can be used to screen individuals being at high risk of psychosis in Austria (Bukenaite et al, 2017) and China (Mark & Toulopoulou, 2017). The results from the two studies in Austria and China are suggestive of possible universal clinical utility of the CAPE.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Indonesian Version of Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences

Jaya¹

2017

Makara Hubs-Asia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE) is a popular self-report questionnaire that measures lifetime psychotic experiences. However, despite being popular, a consistent factorial structure across nations has not been found. Furthermore, the factorial structure of the Indonesian version has not been examined questioning the types of symptoms that can be measured. Cross-sectional community sample from Indonesia (N = 844) was used in this study. Confirmatory factor analyses results showed that the original three dimensions and nine dimensions factorial structure of the CAPE were found to have an acceptable fit to the data. However, the nine dimensions factorial structure has significantly better fit than the three dimensions. Therefore, the Indonesian version of the CAPE consists of positive symptoms (bizarre experiences, hallucinations, paranoia, magical thinking and grandiosity), negative symptoms (affective flattening, social withdrawal, and avolition) and depressive symptoms. Analisis Faktor Konfirmatoris Dari Assesmen Komunitas terhadap Pengalaman Psikotik versi Indonesia AbstrakAsesmen Komunitas terhadap Pengalaman Psikotik (AKPP) adalah kuesioner populer yang mengukur pengalaman psikotik seumur hidup. Namun, meskipun populer, struktur faktor yang konsisten antar negara-negara belum ditemukan. Selain itu, struktur faktor untuk kuesioner versi Indonesia belum diteliti. Tanpa mengetahui struktur faktor kuesioner AKPP dalam bahasa Indonesia, kita tidak dapat mengetahui jenis gejala psikotik apa saja yang dapat diukur dengan baik di Indonesia dengan kuesioner ini. Sampel komunitas cross-sectional dari Indonesia (N = 844) digunakan dalam penelitian ini. Analisis faktor konfirmatori menunjukkan bahwa tiga dimensi dan sembilan dimensi struktur faktor AKPP memiliki fit yang baik dengan data. Namun, sembilan dimensi struktur faktorial lebih cocok daripada tiga dimensi secara signifikan. Oleh karena itu, AKPP bisa dianggap mengukur gejala positif (pengalaman aneh, halusinasi, paranoia, pemikiran magis, dan waham kebesaran), gejala negatif (afek datar, penarikan sosial, dan amotivasi) dan gejala depresi.

show abstract

“…Self-reported subclinical psychotic experiences were assessed using the Chinese version of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE-C15) [26–28]. The translated version of the CAPE includes three subscales (Positive, Negative, Depressive) consisting of 4, 5 and 6 items respectively.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The translated version of the CAPE includes three subscales (Positive, Negative, Depressive) consisting of 4, 5 and 6 items respectively. An example item is: ''Do you ever feel there is a conspiracy against you?/ Further description of the CAPE-C15 and the translation process can be found in our labs previous report [26]. In the current sample the CAPE-C15 reached an internal consistency of Cronbach Alpha 0.86, representing good/excellent reliability, and the positive, negative and depressive subscales had a Cronbach alpha coefficient of 0.79, 0.71, and 0.79, respectively.…”

Section: Psychosis Pronenessmentioning

confidence: 99%

Negative social comparisons and psychosis proneness in a healthy adolescent population

Cotier

Toulopoulou

2017

Eur. psychiatr.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is growing evidence of an association between negative social comparisons (NSC) and both psychosis, and psychosis proneness. The majority of the work thus far, however, has focused largely on one type of NSC, namely, social rank. Whilst social rank is clearly an important factor, an individual's perception of belonging is likely also of importance; particularly, when considering individuals from collectivistic cultures such as China, where greater emphasis is placed on fitting into the group. There is also limited research investigating what factors may contribute towards the relationship between NSC and psychosis proneness, and to what extent this relationship may be due to common familial factors. To address these issues, we examined whether (1) Social rank and perceived belonging predict negative, positive and depressive psychotic experiences in a Chinese, adolescent, twin and sibling population, (2) coping styles moderate the impact of these relationships and (3), there is a familial association between NSC and psychosis proneness. Both social rank and perceived belonging were found to predict the negative and depressive dimensions of psychosis. These relationships were moderated by problem-focused coping styles. Interestingly, the association between perception of belonging, and negative psychotic experiences was familial—and stronger in Monozygotic twins—indicating perhaps shared aetiology due to common genes. Our findings highlight NSC as potential vulnerability markers for negative and depressive psychotic experiences, and suggest potentially different aetiological pathways amongst different NSC and different psychotic experiences. On a clinical level, our findings emphasize the need to consider coping styles when treating at-risk individuals.

show abstract

Validation of the Chinese version of Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE) in an adolescent general population

Cited by 33 publications

References 28 publications

Cultural Differences in Psychosis: The Role of Causal Beliefs and Stigma in White British and South Asians

Cultural Differences in Psychosis: The Role of Causal Beliefs and Stigma in White British and South Asians

Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Indonesian Version of Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences

Negative social comparisons and psychosis proneness in a healthy adolescent population

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About