Validation of the FEEL-KJ: An Instrument to Measure Emotion Regulation Strategies in Children and Adolescents

Abstract

Although the field of emotion regulation in children and adolescents is growing, there is need for age-adjusted measures that assess a large variety of strategies. An interesting instrument in this respect is the FEEL-KJ because it measures 7 adaptive and 5 maladaptive emotion regulation strategies in response to three different emotions. However, the FEEL-KJ has not yet been validated extensively. Therefore, the current study aims to test the internal structure and validity of the FEEL-KJ in a large sample of Dutch-speaking Belgian children and adolescents (N = 1102, 8–18 years old). The investigation of the internal structure confirms earlier reports of a two-factor structure with Adaptive and Maladaptive Emotion Regulation as overarching categories. However, it also suggests that the two-factor model is more complex than what was previously assumed. The evaluation of the FEEL-KJ validity furthermore provides evidence for its construct and external validity. In sum, the current study confirms that the FEEL-KJ is a valuable and reliable measure of emotion regulation strategies in children and adolescents.

Testicular growth and spermatogenesis: new goals for pubertal hormone replacement in boys with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism? -a multicentre prospective study of hCG/rFSH treatment outcomes during adolescence-

“…QoL post‐gonadotropin treatment, compared to pretreatment, assessed by three standardized questionnaires: ‘Inventory for assessment of quality of life in children and adolescents’ (‘ILK’), ‘Inventory for assessment of depression in children and adolescents’ (‘DIKJ’) and ‘Questionnaire for assessment of emotion regulation strategies in children and adolescents’ (‘FEEL‐KJ’), and by two questions on self‐perceived satisfaction with testis size and masculinity.…”

An emotion regulation training in the treatment of obesity in young adolescents: The protocol of a Randomized Controlled Trial

“…Items are answered on a five-point Likert scale (from 0= not at all to 4= almost always). For the Dutch and Flemish population, representative norms are available (Braet et al, 2013) and a good reliability and validity was found (Cracco, van Durme, & Braet, 2015).…”

Adaptive emotion regulation, academic performance and internalising problems in Flemish children with special educational needs: a pilot study

“…Each strategy is measured by rating two items for each of the three emotions, whereby answers are given on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = almost never; 2 = rarely; 3 = occasionally; 4 = often; 5 = almost always). Regarding psychometric qualities, the FEEL-KJ is well-validated and reliable (Cracco, Van Durme, & Braet, 2015). As the current study aims to include a broad range of adaptive emotion regulation strategies, a global composite score of teacher-rated adaptive emotion regulation was used (42 items; α = .97).…”