Validation of the Russian-language version of the Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS)

Zholtikov, Vitaly; Korableva, N. P.; Lebedeva, Yu. V.; Saltychev, Mikhail; Most, S.M.; Moubayed, Sami P.

doi:10.17116/plast.hirurgia202102181

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…12 The SCHNOS is available in Portuguese, Turkish, Korean, Arabic, English, French, Persian, Spanish, and Russian. 9,[13][14][15][16][17] Only a few questionnaires concerning nasal surgery are available in Dutch including the Utrecht Questionnaire for Outcome Assessment in Aesthetic Rhinoplasty, the NOSE, and the rhinoplasty module of the FACE-Q. [18][19][20] The aim of this study was to translate and validate the SCHNOS in a Dutchspeaking population in order to suggest a short and valid tool to measure functional and aesthetic outcomes of rhinoplasty.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Translation and Validation of the Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey in Dutch

Pingnet¹,

Verkest²,

M³

et al. 2022

B-ENT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey is a validated instrument for patients undergoing rhinoplasty surgery. The aim of this study was to validate a Dutch-language version of the Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey. Methods: The Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey was translated and back-translated and 10 Dutch-speaking rhinoplasty patients were interviewed to evaluate the translation. The translated version was administered to 25 rhinoplasty patients (cases) and 25 controls at 2-week intervals. The internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and factor structure of Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey were measured. Results: Both the obstructive domain of the Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey and the cosmetic domain showed a high internal consistency, alpha 0.94 and 0.95, respectively. The Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey was reliable showing very strong test-retest correlations of 0.93 for Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey-obstructive domain and 0.94 for Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey-cosmetic domain, respectively. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test showed a significant difference between cases and controls for the Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey-cosmetic domain (P = .0001) but not for the Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey-obstructive domain (P = .14). Exploratory factor analysis showed unidimensionality for both the Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey-cosmetic domain and the Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey-obstructive domain. Conclusion: The Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey was successfully translated, culturally adopted, and validated for its use in a Dutch-speaking population of rhinoplasty patients.

show abstract