2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2020.104722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of volume-of-fluid OpenFOAM® isoAdvector solvers using single bubble benchmarks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
46
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study adopts the geometric reconstruction, proposed by Cummins, Francois & Kothe (2005) and later adopted by Gamet et al. (2020), in which the curvature is calculated by the RDF, , as A geometrical clarification of the RDF is provided in figure 1. The RDF is calculated in a band around the interface, using the following: the normalized gradient of the RDF is then calculated as the last step is a computation of the curvature, performed by first by taking the divergence of and then interpolating it from cell centres to the interface.…”
Section: Numerical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The present study adopts the geometric reconstruction, proposed by Cummins, Francois & Kothe (2005) and later adopted by Gamet et al. (2020), in which the curvature is calculated by the RDF, , as A geometrical clarification of the RDF is provided in figure 1. The RDF is calculated in a band around the interface, using the following: the normalized gradient of the RDF is then calculated as the last step is a computation of the curvature, performed by first by taking the divergence of and then interpolating it from cell centres to the interface.…”
Section: Numerical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RDF in a cell is measured as the minimum distance from the cell barycentre to the interface. The method employed in this study follows approaches by (Roenby et al 2017;Scheufler & Roenby 2019), in which the reconstructed interface is transported geometrically using the isoAdvector method to improve accuracy, as compared with the algebraic counterpart (Gamet et al 2020). While they are useful in many practical applications, algebraic methods suffer from numerical diffusion at the interface due to discontinuity in the volume fraction function.…”
Section: Interface Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A multitude of improvements to the continuous force model have been proposed, ranging from more accurate curvature estimation algorithms to more robust discrete handling of the balance between pressure and surface tension forces; see, for example, [26]. An improved interface reconstruction algorithm for the herein-used geometric VoF method was recently validated in [27]. The results showed a reduction in parasitic current in the canonical benchmark case of a stagnant bubble in a quiescent liquid.…”
Section: Instability Sources In Vof Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From interIsoFoam, the isoAdvector algorithm applied introduces a sub-grid scale model for estimating intracellular distribution from the given volume fraction data to capture this local distribution information to keep the density field sharp and bounded. Further information on the isoAdvector algorithm is provided in Gamet et al [9].…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%