Validez de estudios peruanos sobre estrés y burnout

Reliability Generalization Study of the Person-Centered Care Assessment Tool

“…Given that the synthesis studies on the measurement of PCC have characterized it as a space where there is underreporting of psychometric properties and insufficient evidence of validity, substantive non-psychometric studies require providing evidence of the dimensionality of the scores, to validate the use of the α coefficient in particular (Savalei and Reise, 2019). This ensures that the reliability estimate is valid and adequate for the data (Cho, 2016), and avoids measurement validity induction from research carried out in different contexts, on qualitatively different samples, and with different study objectives (Merino-Soto and Calderón-de la Cruz, 2018;Angulo-Ramos, 2020, 2021). Part of this specific underreporting occurred in the interfactor correlations of the P-CAT, given that the psychometric studies that obtained a multidimensional factorial solution did not report this important psychometric parameter, which helps to diagnose the degree of dependence between factors and, consequently, the multidimensionality of the P-CAT.…”

Análisis de la estructura interna del Maslach Burnout Inventory (Human Service Survey) en médicos peruanos

“…In this sense, it is necessarily relevant to verify the factor structure of mbi-hss in each medical group, and by implication, in each Peruvian work group in which the instrument is used. This type of evaluation reduces the risk of inducing validity when it is not justified (39).…”

“…18 (2): 1-17, mayo-agosto de 2020 use of this instrument with the validation process performed in contexts other than Peru, a premise adopted assuming cultural similarity (38). This practice, known as validity and reliability induction, is not recommended, as it involves transferring the validity or reliability evidence from one construct developed in one context to a new one, without enough rationality or the verified application sample and the suitability of it assessment (39). Taking the recommendations from the American Education Research Association, the American Psychological Association, and the National Council of Educational Measurement into account, the priority of assessing the internal structure of measurement instruments in contexts not previously examined is an essential requirement and a condition for other validation sources subsequent to the internal structure definition (40).…”

Estudio Intercultural de una Batería Sociocognitiva de Autoeficacia Vocacional

“…investigación se circunscribe exclusivamente a estudiantes de psicología, y el contenido muestreado es relevante a las competencias esperadas e integradas en su perfil profesional (González, González, & Vicencio, 2014;Lunt, Peiró, Poortinga, & Roe, 2015 Education, 1985); la comprobación, en contextos distintos, de las evidencias métricas (Elosua, 2003;Merino-Soto & Calderón-De la Cruz, 2018) e invarianza factorial (Barrera-Barrera, Navarro- García, & Peris-Ortiz, 2015;Gálvez-Nieto, Salvo, Trizano-Hermosila, Hederich, & Polanco, 2018;Leal-Soto & Alonso-Tapia, 2017), así como también, obtener evidencias externas de validez (Domínguez-Lara, 2018); y, hallar la capacidad predictiva de la batería de instrumentos sobre el desempeño pre-profesional.…”