Validez factorial del “cuestionario para la evaluación del síndrome de quemarse por el Trabajo” (CESQT) en una muestra de médicos mexicanos

Gil‐Monte, Pedro R.; Zúñiga-Caballero, Leslie Claret

doi:10.11144/javeriana.upsy9-1.vfce

Cited by 87 publications

(180 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…These values are very close to those found in the study with employees working with people with intellectual disability by . However, this item did not present any striking psychometric values in previous studies using the Spanish version of the SBI (Gil-Monte et al, 2009). Item 4 from the Guilt scale presented the highest item mean of all the items from this scale.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 58%

“…These values are very close to those found in the study with employees working with people with intellectual disability by Gil‐Monte and Figueiredo‐Ferraz (). However, this item did not present any striking psychometric values in previous studies using the Spanish version of the SBI (Gil‐Monte et al., ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 51%

“…Item 4 from the Guilt scale presented the highest item mean of all the items from this scale. In previous studies, using the Spanish version (Gil‐Monte et al., ), results for the item's mean have been similar, although the item did not negatively contribute to the score reliability of the scale. This result can be understood by the fact that the item wording does not explicitly refer to feelings of guilt as the remaining items do.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 59%

“…Results have been replicated by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), obtaining empirical support for the four‐factor structure model across countries and occupational groups: Spanish professionals working with intellectually disabled people (Gil‐Monte & Figueiredo‐Ferraz, ), Mexican doctors (Gil‐Monte & Zúñiga‐Caballero, ), Mexican teachers (Gil‐Monte, Unda, & Sandoval, ), and German human services professionals (Bosle & Gil‐Monte, ).…”

mentioning

confidence: 91%

“…Results have been replicated by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), obtaining empirical support for the four-factor structure model across countries and occupational groups: Spanish professionals working with intellectu- Unda, & Sandoval, 2009), and German human services professionals (Bosle & Gil-Monte, 2010).…”

mentioning

confidence: 92%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Factor analysis of the Spanish Burnout Inventory among public administration employees

2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Burnout has been recognized as an important stress-related problem. Researchers have been troubled by some of the psychometric limitations of the questionnaires developed to evaluate burnout. This study was designed to assess the factor structure of the Spanish Burnout Inventory in a sample of 548 Brazilian public administration employees. This instrument comprises 20 items distributed in four dimensions: enthusiasm toward the job (5 items), psychological exhaustion (4 items), indolence (6 items), and guilt (5 items). The factor structure was examined through confirmatory factor analysis. To assess the factorial validity of the Spanish Burnout Inventory, four alternative models were tested. The four-factor model obtained an adequate data fit for the sample, χ

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 58%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 51%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 59%

mentioning

confidence: 91%

mentioning

confidence: 92%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Factor analysis of the Spanish Burnout Inventory among public administration employees

2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Prevalence of Burnout Among Physicians

Rotenstein

Torre

Ramos

et al. 2018

JAMA

1,432

1,215

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IMPORTANCE Burnout is a self-reported job-related syndrome increasingly recognized as a critical factor affecting physicians and their patients. An accurate estimate of burnout prevalence among physicians would have important health policy implications, but the overall prevalence is unknown. OBJECTIVE To characterize the methods used to assess burnout and provide an estimate of the prevalence of physician burnout. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION Systematic search of EMBASE, ERIC, MEDLINE/PubMed, psycARTICLES, and psycINFO for studies on the prevalence of burnout in practicing physicians (ie, excluding physicians in training) published before June 1, 2018. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Burnout prevalence and study characteristics were extracted independently by 3 investigators. Although meta-analytic pooling was planned, variation in study designs and burnout ascertainment methods, as well as statistical heterogeneity, made quantitative pooling inappropriate. Therefore, studies were summarized descriptively and assessed qualitatively. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Point or period prevalence of burnout assessed by questionnaire. RESULTS Burnout prevalence data were extracted from 182 studies involving 109 628 individuals in 45 countries published between 1991 and 2018. In all, 85.7% (156/182) of studies used a version of the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) to assess burnout. Studies variably reported prevalence estimates of overall burnout or burnout subcomponents: 67.0% (122/182) on overall burnout, 72.0% (131/182) on emotional exhaustion, 68.1% (124/182) on depersonalization, and 63.2% (115/182) on low personal accomplishment. Studies used at least 142 unique definitions for meeting overall burnout or burnout subscale criteria, indicating substantial disagreement in the literature on what constituted burnout. Studies variably defined burnout based on predefined cutoff scores or sample quantiles and used markedly different cutoff definitions. Among studies using instruments based on the MBI, there were at least 47 distinct definitions of overall burnout prevalence and 29, 26, and 26 definitions of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and low personal accomplishment prevalence, respectively. Overall burnout prevalence ranged from 0% to 80.5%. Emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and low personal accomplishment prevalence ranged from 0% to 86.2%, 0% to 89.9%, and 0% to 87.1%, respectively. Because of inconsistencies in definitions of and assessment methods for burnout across studies, associations between burnout and sex, age, geography, time, specialty, and depressive symptoms could not be reliably determined. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this systematic review, there was substantial variability in prevalence estimates of burnout among practicing physicians and marked variation in burnout definitions, assessment methods, and study quality. These findings preclude definitive conclusions about the prevalence of burnout and highlight the importance of developing a consensus definition of burnout and of standardiz...

show abstract

Feeling Guilty or Not Guilty. Identifying Burnout Profiles among Italian Teachers

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Validez factorial del “cuestionario para la evaluación del síndrome de quemarse por el Trabajo” (CESQT) en una muestra de médicos mexicanos

Cited by 87 publications

References 6 publications

Factor analysis of the Spanish Burnout Inventory among public administration employees

Factor analysis of the Spanish Burnout Inventory among public administration employees

Prevalence of Burnout Among Physicians

Feeling Guilty or Not Guilty. Identifying Burnout Profiles among Italian Teachers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About