Validity and reliability of a Persian version of the quality of masticatory function questionnaire for edentulous patients

Khodaeian, Niloufar; Rismanchian, Mansour; Behzadi, Ali; Jowkar, Fariba

doi:10.4103/1735-3327.178203

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Responses are recorded on a 5‐point Likert scale, with questions related to chewing ability (1 = always problems/major difficulties, 5 = never problems/no difficulties). The translated QMFQ versions have a good internal consistency (Cronbach's α : 0.87–0.91) 29,30 . In this study, the English version was translated into Dutch.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Masticatory function in edentulous patients wearing implant overdentures after graftless maxillary sinus membrane elevation

Lie,

Speksnijder,

Kalic

et al. 2024

J of Oral Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundGraftless sinus floor augmentation shows good results in bone gain, radiology and implant survival. Clinically, this technique can be recommended as an alternative to conventional procedures using augmentation materials.ObjectivesThis study aims to assess masticatory performance, masticatory ability and patient satisfaction after graftless sinus floor augmentation.MethodsThe study group consisted of patients who had received a graftless sinus lift procedure in a split‐mouth design and was compared to patients with maxillary implant‐supported overdentures without augmentation and a natural dentition group. To assess objective masticatory performance, the mixing ability test was performed. Three questionnaires were used to assess patient reported outcomes related to mastication and patient satisfaction.ResultsEach group included ten patients. Both the graftless sinus lift group and the edentulous control group had a worse masticatory performance compared to the natural dentition group. Masticatory ability, measured by patient reported outcomes, was not different between the graftless sinus floor augmentation group and implant‐retained overdentures group without augmentation, but the natural dentition group showed better results. Thereby, the better the masticatory performance in patients with a graftless sinus membrane elevation the better the patient satisfaction for ‘prosthesis’, ‘appearance of prostheses’, ‘speech’ and ‘mastication and eating’.ConclusionsPatients with implant‐supported overdentures show inferior masticatory function compared to those with natural dentition. There were no significant differences in masticatory performance between patients with implant‐retained overdentures, with or without graftless augmentation. The decision on the preferred procedure should consider additional factors such as anatomical, surgical‐technical aspects and patient's preferences.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The translated QMFQ versions have a good internal consistency (Cronbach's α: 0.87-0.91). 29,30 In this study, the English version was translated into Dutch. The translation into Dutch was performed by two independent experts in the field; both are oral and maxillofacial surgeons at MUMC+.…”

Section: Masticatory Abilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Masticatory function in edentulous patients wearing implant overdentures after graftless maxillary sinus membrane elevation

Lie,

Speksnijder,

Kalic

et al. 2024

J of Oral Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Development and validation of a chewing function questionnaire for Chinese older adults

Fan

Shu

et al. 2021

Journal of Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Patient-reported outcome measures for masticatory function in adults: a systematic review

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective The aim of this systematic review was to critically evaluate the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for masticatory function in adults. Methods Five electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL Plus and APA PsycINFO) were searched up to March 2021. Studies reporting development or validation of PROMs for masticatory function on adults were identified. Methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) risk of bias checklist. Psychometric properties of the PROM in each included study were rated against the criteria for good measurement properties based on the COSMIN guideline. Results Twenty-three studies investigating 19 PROMs were included. Methodological qualities of these studies were diverse. Four types of PROMs were identified: questions using food items to assess masticatory function (13 PROMs), questions on chewing problems (3 PROMs), questions using both food items and chewing problems (2 PROMs) and a global question (1 PROM). Only a few of these PROMs, namely chewing function questionnaire-Chinese, Croatian or Albanian, food intake questionnaire-Japanese, new food intake questionnaire-Japanese, screening for masticatory disorders in older adults and perceived difficulty of chewing-Tanzania demonstrated high or moderate level of evidence in several psychometric properties. Conclusions Currently, there is no PROM for masticatory function in adults with high-level evidence for all psychometric properties. There are variations in the psychometric properties among the different reported PROMs. Trial Registration PROSPERO (CRD42020171591).

show abstract

Validity and reliability of a Persian version of the quality of masticatory function questionnaire for edentulous patients

Cited by 3 publications

References 26 publications

Masticatory function in edentulous patients wearing implant overdentures after graftless maxillary sinus membrane elevation

Masticatory function in edentulous patients wearing implant overdentures after graftless maxillary sinus membrane elevation

Development and validation of a chewing function questionnaire for Chinese older adults

Patient-reported outcome measures for masticatory function in adults: a systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About