Validity and Reliability of a Food Skills Questionnaire

Kennedy, Lauren G.; Kichler, Emily J.; Seabrook, Jamie A.; Matthews, June; Dworatzek, Paula D.N.

doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2019.02.003

Cited by 54 publications

(87 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…After reviewing the titles and abstracts, we selected 16 articles for full-text examination. Of these, nine studies (Michaud, 2007 [ 37 ]; Warmin, 2009 [ 38 ]; Condrasky et al ., 2011 [ 39 ]; Jomori et al , 2017 [ 40 ]; Barton et al , 2011 [ 41 ]; Kowalkowska et al , 2018 [ 42 ]; Lavelle et al , 2017 [ 43 ]; Kennedy et al , 2019 [ 44 ]; Martins et al , 2019 [ 45 ]) met the inclusion criteria for review. A list of the excluded studies is available in the S2 Table .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Studies were carried out in the United States of America (Michaud, 2007 [ 37 ]; Warmin, 2009 [ 38 ]; Condrasky et al , 2011 [ 39 ]; Condrasky et al , 2013 [ 48 ]), Brazil (Jomori et al , 2017 [ 40 ]; Martins et al , 2019 [ 45 ]), Canada (Vrhovnik, 2012 [ 47 ]; Kennedy et al , 2019 [ 44 ]), Switzerland (Hartmann et al , 2013 [ 46 ]), Portugal (Kowalkowska et al , 2018 [ 42 ]), Scotland (Barton et al , 2011 [ 41 ]) and Northern Ireland and Republic of Ireland (Lavelle et al , 2017 [ 43 ]). All of them were published in English, between 2007 and 2019.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Included papers had distinct purposes: those reporting the development of an original instrument, or cross-cultural adaptation of a tool to explicitly measure cooking/food skills or a part thereof (n = 7) and original tools developed to evaluate a cooking and food skills intervention (n = 5). Most tools assessed cooking skills in adults from a particular country (Hartmann et al , 2013 [ 46 ]; Lavelle et al , 2017 [ 43 ]; Vrhovnik, 2012 [ 47 ]; Kennedy et al l, 2019 [ 44 ]), parents of schoolchildren responsible for food preparation at home (Martins et al , 2019 [ 45 ]), university students (Warmin, 2009 [ 38 ]; Jomori et al , 2017 [ 40 ]; Kowalkowska et al , 2018 [ 42 ]) and adults of low-income communities, participants in culinary skills and nutrition education programs (Michaud, 2007 [ 37 ]; Condrasky et al , 2011 [ 39 ]; Condrasky et al , 2013 [ 48 ]; Barton et al , 2011 [ 41 ]). Study samples were mostly composed of women (Barton et al , 2011 [ 41 ], Condrasky et al , 2011 [ 39 ]; Martins et al , 2019 [ 45 ]; Kennedy et al , 2019 [ 44 ]; Kowalkowska et al , 2018 [ 42 ]; Michaud, 2007 [ 37 ]; Warmin, 2009 [ 38 ]; Vrhovnik, 2012 [ 47 ]).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The remaining studies (Hartmann et al ., 2013 [ 46 ]; Kowalkowska et al ., 2018 [ 42 ]; Lavelle et al ., 2017 [ 43 ]; Vrhovnik, 2012 [ 47 ]; Kennedy et al ., 2019 [ 44 ]; Martins, et al ., 2019 [ 45 ]) described the results of the development and validation or cross-cultural adaptation of tools aiming to evaluate adults’ cooking and/or food skills or a part thereof, with some similarities. The instruments’ domains ranged from 1 to 3 and the number of items ranged from 7 to 39, mainly related to ‘food preparation techniques’, ‘meal planning’ and ‘food selection and purchase’.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Systematic review of instruments for assessing culinary skills in adults: What is the quality of their psychometric properties?

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Culinary skills are important objects of study in the field of Public Health. Studies that propose to develop instruments for assessing such construct show lack of methodological uniformity to report validity and reliability of their instruments. Objective To identify studies that have developed instruments to measure culinary skills in adult population, and critically assess their psychometric properties. Design We conducted a systematic review according to the PRISMA statement. We searched literature PubMed/Medline, Scopus, LILACS, and Web of Science databases until January 2021, and consulted Google Scholar for relevant grey literature. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, conducted data extraction, and assessed the psychometric quality of the instruments. A third reviewer resolved any doubts or disagreements in all steps of the systematic review. Results The search identified 1148 potentially relevant studies, out of which 9 met the inclusion criteria. In addition, we included 3 studies by searching the related articles and the reference lists of these studies, totaling 12 included studies in this review. Ten studies reported the development of tools measuring culinary skills in adults and 2 studies performed cross-cultural adaptations of original instruments. We considered adequate quality of internal consistency reliability in four studies. One study received adequate rating for test-retest reliability. No studies presented adequate rating for content validity and four studies showed satisfactory results for at least one type of construct validity. One study reported criterion validity and the quality of this psychometric property was inadequate. Conclusions We identified many studies that surveyed culinary skills. Although the isolated measures appraised in this review show good promise in terms of quality of psychometric properties, no studies presented adequate measures for each aspect of reliability and validity. A more consistent and consensual definition of culinary skills is recommended. The flaws observed in these studies show that there is a need for ongoing research in the area of the psychometric properties of instruments assessing culinary skills.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Systematic review of instruments for assessing culinary skills in adults: What is the quality of their psychometric properties?

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The content validity ratio (CVR) was assessed using the following four-point Likert scale: very inappropriate, inappropriate, appropriate, and very appropriate. The content was considered sufficient if the value was >0.99 for 5 experts, 0.62 for 10 experts, and 0.42 for 20 experts [ 14 ]. For the assessment of face validity, 10 adults aged > 65 years were recruited through convenience sampling and interviewed to determine whether the questions were straightforward to answer.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development and Validation of a Food Literacy Assessment Tool for Community-Dwelling Elderly People

Park

Mi-Ja

et al. 2021

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Food literacy refers to the knowledge, skills, and attitudes required for individuals to choose foods that promote health. As the rate of diet-related diseases increases, food literacy is becoming more important. However, there are no tools available to evaluate food literacy among the Korean elderly. We derived 547 questions from a literature review and, after three rounds of Delphi surveys, selected 33 preliminary questions. We calculated the content validity ratio of the questions and applied a face validity procedure. We then selected 32 questions, assessed their validity, and distributed them as a questionnaire to 205 elderly people. We then conducted exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to determine the validity of the questionnaire and used an internal consistency index (Cronbach’s α coefficient) to determine reliability. Based on the factor analysis, 13 questions were selected, distributed among three factors, and evaluated using the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett sphericity tests. The factor analysis showed that KMO was 0.872, which is a highly acceptable score, and the Bartlett sphericity test was χ2 = 1,374.69 at p = 0.00. The food literacy questionnaire developed in this study will likely be helpful for improving the healthcare of elderly people.

show abstract

Evaluation of Reliability and Validity of Instruments for Digital Government Competency Framework for Omani Public Sector Administrators: Acceptance Study

Al-Mahrezi

Bakar

Sjarif

2023

Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Validity and Reliability of a Food Skills Questionnaire

Cited by 54 publications

References 36 publications

Systematic review of instruments for assessing culinary skills in adults: What is the quality of their psychometric properties?

Systematic review of instruments for assessing culinary skills in adults: What is the quality of their psychometric properties?

Development and Validation of a Food Literacy Assessment Tool for Community-Dwelling Elderly People

Evaluation of Reliability and Validity of Instruments for Digital Government Competency Framework for Omani Public Sector Administrators: Acceptance Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About