2021
DOI: 10.1111/odi.14059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity and reliability of immunochromatographic IgM/IgG rapid tests for COVID‐19 salivary diagnosis

Abstract: Viral genetic sequencing using real-time reverse transcriptionpolymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) is the most widely used technique for diagnosing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) due to its high sensitivity and specificity in cases of acute infection (Wang et al., 2020). However, qRT-PCR tests can be labor-intensive, requiring specialized equipment and a centralized laboratory, which increases the wait time for the results and the costs (Dinnes et al., 2021). In a systematic review, Mallet et al. (2020) de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There has been a rapid evolution of antibody diagnostics over the course of the COVID19 pandemic encompassing a range of assay formats and investigating multiple targets. Whilst serum/plasma samples remain the gold standard for antibody detection, other non-venous analytes including DBS [20][21][22] and saliva [23][24][25] have been successfully utilised for the detection and monitoring of antibody responses. Gingival crevicular fluid has some useful advantages over these analytes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been a rapid evolution of antibody diagnostics over the course of the COVID19 pandemic encompassing a range of assay formats and investigating multiple targets. Whilst serum/plasma samples remain the gold standard for antibody detection, other non-venous analytes including DBS [20][21][22] and saliva [23][24][25] have been successfully utilised for the detection and monitoring of antibody responses. Gingival crevicular fluid has some useful advantages over these analytes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 16 However, less is known how SARS CoV-2 antibody titers in the saliva correlate with those measured in the serum. 17 , 18 , 19 The SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with marked increase in serum cytokines that promote tissue damage and inflammation (cytokine storm) in severely ill patients 20 ; however, the response of salivary and serum cytokines to SARS- CoV-2 infection induced oral manifestations has not yet been studied in depth. 21 Our primary objective was to determine whether COVID-19 PCR positive patients with xerostomia or loss of taste had altered serum or specific saliva cytokine levels compared to COVID-19 positive patients without those oral symptoms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%