2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-200x.2011.03434.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity and reliability of physical activity questionnaire for Japanese students

Abstract: Questionnaires may be useful in epidemiological studies for ranking physical activity levels of adolescents, such as a confounding factor for other lifestyle surveys, but these surveys are less accurate for younger children.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
10

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(79 reference statements)
0
7
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…A questionnaire is a simple and convenient tool for measuring PA. In a study based on a questionnaire that we developed previously, there was a high correlation between questionnaire‐estimated PA and objectively measured PA in secondary school students ( ρ = 0.67–0.73). In primary school students, however, this correlation was low ( ρ = 0.17–0.37).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A questionnaire is a simple and convenient tool for measuring PA. In a study based on a questionnaire that we developed previously, there was a high correlation between questionnaire‐estimated PA and objectively measured PA in secondary school students ( ρ = 0.67–0.73). In primary school students, however, this correlation was low ( ρ = 0.17–0.37).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A Tabela 1 apresenta a descrição dos 26 estudos. A confiabilidade teste-reteste foi investigada em 20 9,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] deles, a validade de critério em 25 9,14-19,21-24,28-41 e a consistência interna em 5 16,21,37,38,40 . Em nenhum dos estudos, foi investigada a responsividade dos questionários.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Os estudos de Barbosa et al 32 , Corder et al 36 , Florindo et al 30 , Farias Júnior et al 15 e Guedes et al 28 obtiveram classificação de qualidade "fraco", enquanto Lachat et al 34 foi o único com classificação "bom". Os demais 9,14,[16][17][18][19][21][22][23][24]29,31,33,35,[37][38][39][40][41] apresentaram qualidade "razoável" para esta categoria".…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
See 2 more Smart Citations