2001
DOI: 10.1590/s0004-282x2001000200004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity and reliability of the Portuguese version of the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) for the detection of delirium in the elderly

Abstract: -This study has tested the validity and reliability of the Portuguese version of the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM), a diagnostic assessment instrument for delirium developed by Inouye et al. (1990). The sample was formed by 100 patients with 60 and more years of age, admitted at the emergency service of Santa Casa de São Paulo, in the time periods between July and August, 1996, November and December, 1996 and February and March, 1997. The sensibility was 94.1% and specificity 96.4%. The assessors reliabil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
78
0
21

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
78
0
21
Order By: Relevance
“…O número médio de medicamentos em uso (3,65 fármacos), também encontrado em outros estudos, 8,13 aponta a tendência à polifarmácia.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…O número médio de medicamentos em uso (3,65 fármacos), também encontrado em outros estudos, 8,13 aponta a tendência à polifarmácia.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Foi identificado o diagnóstico principal no momento da internação de acordo com a Classificação Internacional de Doenças (CID-10). A função cognitiva foi avaliada por meio do "Mini-Exame do Estado Mental" (MEEM) 11 -30 questões que obtém valores dos domínios da orientação, memória imediata, atenção e cálculo, memória de evocação e linguagem, com a pontuação mínima de zero e máxima de 30 pontos, sendo a nota de corte 24 para determinar déficit cognitivo -e pelo Confusion Assessement Method (CAM), 8,17 instrumentos adaptados transculturalmente e validados para o idioma português.…”
Section: Métodosunclassified
“…The clinical diagnosis of delirium was established using the Portuguese version of the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) translated and validated by Fabbri et al 12 and routinely used in Brazilian clinical practice since its publication in 2001. Positive cases were classified by motor subtypes of delirium 13 : a) hyperactive delirium: evidence in 24 hours prior to diagnosis of at least two of the following symptoms: quantitatively increased motor activity, loss of activity control, restlessness, perambulation; b) Hypoactive delirium: evidence in 24 hours prior to diagnosis of at least two of the following symptoms: significantly reduced activity, decreased movement speed, poor attention to surrounding environment, significantly reduced speech, decreased speech rate, indifference, reduced agility; c) Mixed delirium: evidence of two previous subtypes (hyper and hypoactive) in previous 24 hours; d) non-motor delirium: absence in the previous 24 hours of the symptoms listed in a and b to define the hyperactive and hypoactive subtypes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…44 The Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) has become the most widely used instrument, and the Brazilian translated version shows 94.1% sensitivity and 96.4% specificity. 13,28 The management of delirium patients includes identifying and treating precipitating conditions, such as infections, drugs, water and electrolyte disturbances, ischemic heart disease, pain and bone fratures. 20,40 Preventive measures are aimed at identifying risk factors and minimizing pre- cipitating events.…”
Section: Deliriummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29,38,42 A complete neurological examination can help identify previously undetected stroke and Parkinson's disease manifestations. Assessment scales such as CAM 13,28 and the Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE) 4,7,18 help the diagnosis and first approach of patients in confusional states and their cognitive assessment.…”
Section: Physical Examination and Additional Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%