2021
DOI: 10.3390/nu13093032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity and Reproducibility of a Food Frequency Questionnaire to Assess Nutrients Intake of Pregnant Women in the South-East of Spain

Abstract: Proper nutrition during pregnancy is pivotal to maintain good health for the child and the mother. This study evaluates the reproducibility and validity of a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) designed to assess nutrient intake during pregnancy in the GENEIDA (Genetics, Early life Environmental Exposures and Infant Development in Andalusia) prospective birth cohort study. In addition, the nutrient intake was estimated and then compared with European guidelines and other studies. Diet information was collected … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result can be explained by the flattened slope effect, which implies an attenuated slope of the line (λ), generated by the control of several sources of bias (of information, in the reference instrument, in variations in the study period, and dietary calculations). 23 , 24 Results available in the literature indicate a similar trend of attenuation in the values of the calibration factors, with different variations between 0.10 and 0.48; 10 , 25 , 26 0.50 and 0.70; 27 , 28 and between −0.05 and 0.28, 23 0.4 and 0.9. 29 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…This result can be explained by the flattened slope effect, which implies an attenuated slope of the line (λ), generated by the control of several sources of bias (of information, in the reference instrument, in variations in the study period, and dietary calculations). 23 , 24 Results available in the literature indicate a similar trend of attenuation in the values of the calibration factors, with different variations between 0.10 and 0.48; 10 , 25 , 26 0.50 and 0.70; 27 , 28 and between −0.05 and 0.28, 23 0.4 and 0.9. 29 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Regarding the dietary assessment methods, a R24h and a validated FFQ [35] were performed. For the R24h collection, trained researchers asked for all foods and beverages participants consumed the previous day, using the multiple-pass method [36].…”
Section: Dietary Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%