2009
DOI: 10.1249/mss.0b013e31818e5819
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity and Reproducibility of Motion Sensors in Youth

Abstract: Compared to the review performed in 2004, there is increased evidence for the clinimetric quality of pedometers and accelerometers in youth. Most motion sensors seem reproducible, valid, and feasible in assessing physical activity in youth.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
164
0
7

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
164
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…A slightly modified version of the checklist developed by de Vries and colleagues (14,15) was used to assess the methodological quality and results of the studies included [see appendix (table A)]. For the assessment of the methodological quality of the study, information was extracted and evaluated regarding the study design (sample characteristics, protocol, measurements, and statistical analyses).…”
Section: Quality Assessment Of the Studies And Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A slightly modified version of the checklist developed by de Vries and colleagues (14,15) was used to assess the methodological quality and results of the studies included [see appendix (table A)]. For the assessment of the methodological quality of the study, information was extracted and evaluated regarding the study design (sample characteristics, protocol, measurements, and statistical analyses).…”
Section: Quality Assessment Of the Studies And Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we controlled for several potential confounders we cannot be certain that other unmeasured confounders such as dietary intake and genetic variation, have not influenced our observations. It should also be acknowledged that there is poor to moderate agreement between accelerometry and energy expenditure, and that the Actigraph has poor validity against indirect calorimetry and double-labelled water, especially in young Physical activity and body composition D Moliner-Urdiales et al children, 45 whereas less evidence exist for adolescents. It should be mentioned that the cutoff points used in this study to define physical activity intensities are similar to those used in previous studies, 16,31,32 and that seem to be useful and valid for estimating participation in moderate and vigorous physical activity in children and adolescents, particularly time spent in vigorous physical activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 The validity of the Acti-Watch for capturing youth physical activity compares favorably to that of other motion sensors and is rated moderate-to-good for preschool-aged children. 39 Activity counts indicating the intensity of physical activity were recorded for 1-minute epochs. Accelerometer data were then summarized for the entire 6-day period, including an estimation of the mean activity counts per minute during waking hours.…”
Section: Physical Activity and Anthropometry Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%