2000
DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200010001-00023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of Faculty Ratings of Studentsʼ Clinical Competence in Core Clerkships in Relation to Scores on Licensing Examinations and Supervisorsʼ Ratings in Residency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It may be argued that these findings could be due to the influence of the 'halo effect' of personality on competence ratings. Although further research is needed to refute this argument, our previous study on the long-term predictive validity of competence ratings (Callahan et al, 2000) indicates that the influence of the 'halo effect' would not significantly distort the validity of the ratings. Improving our understanding of specific psychosocial attributes that are associated with the assessments of clinical competence has important implications for the selection and counselling of medical students.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It may be argued that these findings could be due to the influence of the 'halo effect' of personality on competence ratings. Although further research is needed to refute this argument, our previous study on the long-term predictive validity of competence ratings (Callahan et al, 2000) indicates that the influence of the 'halo effect' would not significantly distort the validity of the ratings. Improving our understanding of specific psychosocial attributes that are associated with the assessments of clinical competence has important implications for the selection and counselling of medical students.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These ratings were completed in each clerkship by faculty, using a 4-point scale ('High Honours,' 'Excellent,' 'Good,' and 'Marginal Competence'). Data on psychometrics of these ratings have been reported (Callahan et al, 2000). 248 M. HOJAT ET AL.…”
Section: Measure Of Clinical Competencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a prior study evaluating the predictive validity of student evaluations in basic clerkships on performance for USMLE Step 2 and 3 scores and supervisors' ratings in residency found the strongest association in evaluations from the internal medicine clerkship. 33 This affirms the use of clerkship performance evaluations across a range of skills and to assess change over time. Finally, our analyses are limited by an inability to test for other potential predictor variables, such as clerkship site (location of clerkship) or setting (inpatient vs. outpatient), due to restrictions on data use by Human Subjects considerations.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…[30][31][32] Faculty ratings of students' clinical competence have been predictive of performance on medical licensing examinations and clinical competence ratings in residency. 33 Evaluations at the UWSOM include a final numeric rating on a Likert scale (1-7) for each of 12 clinical skills domains (Table 1). Clinical clerkships at the UWSOM are conducted at clinical sites throughout five states-Washington, Wyoming, Alaska, Montana, and Idaho.…”
Section: Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E-mail: woloschu@ucalgary.ca more promising, 6,15 low correlations between the two have also been reported. 16,17 The primary purpose of this study was to determine whether undergraduate performance of our graduates is predictive of their postgraduate performance. In order to study this relationship we first needed to examine the structure of the postgraduate assessment tool.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%