2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.04.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of motion analysis using the Kinect system to evaluate single leg stance in patients with hip disorders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this longitudinal clinical assessment, a participant’s gait was assessed two times with two different conditions each. Rated as gold standard for investigating changes in gait [3336], a computerized video-based motion analysis system with infrared cameras was used to track changes in pre-defined spatiotemporal parameters. The precision of this system has been shown in various publications [3739].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this longitudinal clinical assessment, a participant’s gait was assessed two times with two different conditions each. Rated as gold standard for investigating changes in gait [3336], a computerized video-based motion analysis system with infrared cameras was used to track changes in pre-defined spatiotemporal parameters. The precision of this system has been shown in various publications [3739].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Kinect for Windows SDK 2.0 allows for tracking the 3D positions and orientations of 25 joints of six users simultaneously [ 9 ]. However, Microsoft has stopped the production of the Kinect v2 [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Además, si se hace una comparación respecto a metodologías las cuales no incluyen el uso del marco de Frenet Serret, pero si el Kinect, se puede encontrar resultados en la clasificación que varían entre el 83% y 93% para la evaluación del movimiento de personas con trastorno de cadera [19], y del 95% en pacientes con Parkinson [2], con la diferencia que estos usan solo un marcador, lo que hace que aumente el porcentaje de clasificación.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified