Validity of self-reported height and weight for estimating prevalence of overweight among Estonian adolescents: the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children study

Abstract

BackgroundLow to moderate agreement between self-reported and directly measured anthropometry is shown in studies for adults and children. However, this issue needs further evaluation during puberty, a period marked by several transitions. We examined the correspondence of BMI status based on self-reported versus measured anthropometric data among Estonian adolescents with a specific focus on gender and age differences.MethodsSelf-reported height and weight were determined in a national representative sample of Estonian schoolchildren collected within the framework of the HBSC (health behaviour of school-aged children) survey. Self-reported and directly measured height and weight were collected from 3379 students (1071 aged 11, 1133 aged 13 and 1175 aged 15 years). The standardized HBSC questionnaire was used for collecting self-reported data; direct anthropometric measures were taken after the HBSC questionnaires were completed. The accuracy of the self-reported values by age and gender groups were determined by comparing mean differences, Bland–Altman plots with limits of agreement, Kappa statistics, and by estimation of the sensitivity and positive predictive value for detecting overweight.ResultsMean self-reported weight, height and body mass index (BMI) values were significantly lower than corresponding values obtained using direct measurements. Mean differences between self-reported and directly measured weight, height and BMI were largest among 11-year-olds and smallest among students aged 15 years. Underestimation of overweight prevalence (includes obese) showed a graded trend which decreased in older age groups; the difference was greater among girls than boys in all age groups. The mean underestimation of overweight prevalence based on self-reported anthropometry was 3.6 percentage points. The positive predictive value was 72.3 % for boys and 63.4 % for girls.ConclusionA distinct age-related pattern in underestimation of weight, height and prevalence of overweight was found; the bias decreased with increasing age. The mean underestimation of overweight prevalence based on self-reports was small, 3.6 %. Self-reported height and weight remain the method of choice in large surveys for practical and logistical reasons.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13104-015-1587-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Trends in prevalence of thinness, overweight and obesity among Swedish children and adolescents between 2004 and 2015

“…There was a higher prevalence of thinness grade 2 among girls, between 2.6% and 3.3% in 2006, compared with the present study . This could have been an effect of self‐reported data, which has been shown to overestimate the prevalence of thinness in this age group . There were not any significant changes in the prevalence of thinness in the Health Behaviour in School‐aged Children study between 1998 and 2006 .…”

An examination of children's eating behaviours as mediators of the relationship between parents' feeding practices and early childhood body mass index z‐scores

“…With this in mind, once cases of biologically implausible data were removed, rates of overweight and obesity in this sample were comparable with national samples of 15.2% overweight and 5.5% obese (4–5 years of age), although rates of underweight appear to be over‐represented compared with national data (22.4% vs. 7.55%, respectively) . Similar to what has been reported in other studies, anthropometric data deemed biologically implausible were higher in boys, although, contrary to other studies, implausible data were higher in younger children . No differences in demographic characteristics were seen between children classified as underweight compared with other BMI categories.…”

Validity of self-reported weight and height: a cross-sectional study among Malaysian adolescents

“…In a US study, this trend was reported only among female adolescents [27]. On the contrary, in a study among Estonian adolescents, the trend was in the opposite direction, with more accurate self-reporting by older adolescents [28]. In addition, Jayawardene and colleagues [25] analysed data from the 2010 US National Youth Physical Activity and Nutrition Survey which showed that US adolescents who were obese or were trying to lose weight tended to under-report their weight, and consequently underestimated their BMI.…”