2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2020.115839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of the Kelvin equation and the equation-of-state-with-capillary-pressure model for the phase behavior of a pure component under nanoconfinement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By regressing measured θ with the [O] for PCMs using available data in the literature (see supporting information for details), θ is estimated using θ = −188°(±16°) [O] + 86.0°(±1.8°). For desorption, θ = 0°is assumed which is consistent with previous studies where water already wetted PCM surfaces (Wang et al, 2020;Wongkoblap et al, 2011). As will be shown below, this approach can account for hysteresis in water retention for both slit and cylindrical pores and the wider hysteresis loops for water retention in more hydrophobic PCMs when a slit pore geometry is assumed (Thommes et al, 2013;Velasco, Guillet-Nicolas, et al, 2016).…”
Section: Gwc Bsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By regressing measured θ with the [O] for PCMs using available data in the literature (see supporting information for details), θ is estimated using θ = −188°(±16°) [O] + 86.0°(±1.8°). For desorption, θ = 0°is assumed which is consistent with previous studies where water already wetted PCM surfaces (Wang et al, 2020;Wongkoblap et al, 2011). As will be shown below, this approach can account for hysteresis in water retention for both slit and cylindrical pores and the wider hysteresis loops for water retention in more hydrophobic PCMs when a slit pore geometry is assumed (Thommes et al, 2013;Velasco, Guillet-Nicolas, et al, 2016).…”
Section: Gwc Bsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The constant C depends on the assumed pore geometry and if water is adsorbing or desorbing. For a slit pore geometry, C = 2 for both adsorption and desorption (Wang et al, 2020), while for a cylindrical pore, C = 2 for adsorption (without the term cos θ in Equation ) and C = 4 for desorption (Wang et al, 2020; Wongkoblap et al, 2011). To use Equation for specified ψ , t b and θ between water and biochar surface must be known.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies show that the accuracy of the Kelvin equation declines in nanopores smaller than 8 . Wang et al 8 investigated the precision of computed phase-change pressures by the Kelvin equation and equation-of-state-with-capillary-pressure (EOS-P cap ) in extended confined pores. Quantitatively, the study demonstrated that overestimation and underestimation issues were noticed with the Kelvin equation and EOS-P cap when predicting condensation and evaporation pressures of propane in pores below 8 , comparing with the density function theory (DFT) predicted outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, some limitations and expectations are discussed, and the conclusions are made. Besides, some basic assumptions are adopted in this study: The fluids are nonpolar, and intermolecular interactions are described with the classical 12-6 LJ potential model; Our work focuses on the ST at the thermodynamic equilibrium state; The fluids are supported to completely wet the pores, and this assumption is common in most of the studies about the thermodynamic equilibrium …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fluids are supported to completely wet the pores, and this assumption is common in most of the studies about the thermodynamic equilibrium …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%