2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of the occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire (OSPAQ) for home-based office workers during the COVID-19 global pandemic: A secondary analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Physical health was assessed through questions on sedentary behaviour and musculoskeletal pain/discomfort frequency and severity levels. Sedentary behaviour was measured using the Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Questionnaire [21,22]. Respondents rated their musculoskeletal discomfort/pain frequency and severity using a 5-point and 3-point Likert scale, respectively, in ve body parts: neck and shoulders; hands and ngers; arms; middle and/or lower back; and hips, bottom, legs, or feet [23].…”
Section: Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical health was assessed through questions on sedentary behaviour and musculoskeletal pain/discomfort frequency and severity levels. Sedentary behaviour was measured using the Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Questionnaire [21,22]. Respondents rated their musculoskeletal discomfort/pain frequency and severity using a 5-point and 3-point Likert scale, respectively, in ve body parts: neck and shoulders; hands and ngers; arms; middle and/or lower back; and hips, bottom, legs, or feet [23].…”
Section: Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data was collected by using Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Questionnaire (OSPAQ). It is a validated instrument to assess self-reported percentages of sitting, standing, walking, and heavy labor at work in the past seven days and the number of days worked during the past seven days [39], [41], [42]. The questionnaire also included socio-demographic data (i.e., gender, education level, body mass index, smoking habit), working conditions (i.e., work from home, work schedule, working hours, and working day).…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As of January 3, 2022, of the 43 articles published in the journals of Ergonomics and Applied Ergonomics that feature the word “COVID” in the text, only 12 articles explored HFE topics in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic specifically. These include the use of face masks, gloves, and other personal protective equipment (PPE) ( Janson et al, 2022 ; Mumma et al, 2022 ; Preece et al, 2021 ), psychological distress in airline pilots as a result of the pandemic ( Alaminos-Torres et al, 2021 ), temperature screening at work ( Goggins et al, 2022 ), physical activities of home-based office workers ( Dillon et al, 2021 ), face-touching behavior during driving ( Ralph et al, 2021 ), effect on travel ( Beh et al, 2021 ), the relevance of distributed situation awareness in light of the pandemic ( Salmon and Plant, 2022 ), access to prehospital emergency health care systems ( Arcuri et al, 2022 ), the necessity of HFE for enhancing work ( de Winter and Hancock, 2021 ) and the impact of HFE on considerations for the field “future of work” ( Bentley et al, 2020 ). In addition, the journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing and Service Industries published a special issue with seven research articles and two review articles focusing on the HFE response to COVID-19, including the safety and accessibility of public spaces during the pandemic ( Stevens et al, 2021 ), decision-making regarding the reopening of places of worship ( Rothrock et al, 2021 ), the validation of cognitive models in the pandemic context ( Stone et al, 2021 ), anthropometric, environmental, and psychosocial factors affecting distance learning during the pandemic ( Ayyildiz and Taskin Gumus, 2021 ), the optimization of the return from lockdown ( Salmon et al, 2021 ), safety in construction ( Stiles et al, 2021 ) and rail operations ( Naweed et al, 2021 ) during the pandemic, and the impacts of the pandemic on work ( Sigahi et al, 2021 ) and work-life balance ( Gulotta et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%