Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the Neck Disability Index

Takeshita, Katsushi; Hosono, Noboru; Kawaguchi, Yoshiharu; Hasegawa, K.; Isomura, Tatsuya; Oshima, Yasushi; Ono, Takashi; Oshina, Masahito; Oda, Takenori; Kato, So; Yonenobu, Kazuo

doi:10.1007/s00776-012-0304-y

Cited by 32 publications

(26 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…After removal of duplicates, 6027 studies remained and were screened using their title and abstract; leaving 29 articles selected for full-text review. Of these, 16 studies were considered eligible 22–37. The flow of the study selection process is presented in figure 1.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychometric properties of the global rating of change scales in patients with neck disorders: a systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveThe purpose of this systematic review was to critically appraise and synthesise the psychometric properties of Global Rating of Change (GROC) scales for assessment of patients with neck pain.DesignSystematic review.Data sourcesA search was performed in four databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SCOPUS) until February 2019.Data extraction and synthesisEligible articles were appraised using Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments checklist and the Quality Appraisal for Clinical Measurement Research Reports Evaluation Form.ResultsThe search obtained 16 eligible studies and included in total 1533 patients with neck pain. Test–retest reliability of global perceived effect (GPE) was very high (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.80 to 0.92) for patients with whiplash. Pooled data of Pearson’s r indicated that GROC scores were moderately correlated with neck disability change scores (0.53, 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.59). Pooled data of Spearman’s correlations indicated that GROC scores were moderately correlated with neck disability change scores (0.56, 95% CI: 0.41 to 0.68).ConclusionsThis study found excellent quality evidence of very good-to-excellent test–retest reliability of GPE for patients with whiplash-associated disorders. Evidence from very good-to-excellent quality studies found that GROC scores are moderately correlated to an external criterion patient-reported outcome measure evaluated pre-post treatment in patients with neck pain. No studies were found that addressed the optimal form of GROC scales for patients with neck disorders or compared the GROC to other options for single-item global assessment.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018117874.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychometric properties of the global rating of change scales in patients with neck disorders: a systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Pain and psychological variables. Pain and psychological variables were measured before treatment through the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), [22,23] the Neck Disability Index (NDI), [24,25] the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), [26,27] the Injustice Experience Questionnaire (IEQ), [9,10] and the Euro Quality of Life five-dimensional Questionnaire (EQ-5D). [28] All questionnaires had translated versions in Japanese.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…ii. NDI [24,25] The 10-item NDI assesses neck pain symptoms. The questions cover pain, personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work, driving, sleeping, and recreation.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Associations between the injustice experience questionnaire and treatment term in patients with acute Whiplash-associated disorder in Japan: Comparison with Canadian data

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction This study aimed to investigate the differences in the Injustice Experience Questionnaire (IEQ) scores during the early period after the diagnosis of Whiplash-associated disorder (WAD) between Japanese and Canadian samples, and the associations between the IEQ scores and treatment terms in Japanese patients with acute WAD. Methods We used secondary data for the IEQ scores of Canadian patients with acute WAD. In Japan, we collected data from 85 consecutively enrolled patients with acute WAD, and their treatment terms were collected; these referred to the number of days between the date of injury and the closure date of the insurance claim and the number of treatment visits. Before treatment, the Numeric Rating Scale, Neck Disability Index, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, IEQ, and Euro Quality of Life five-dimensional questionnaire were administered. The variables were subjected to multivariate analysis with each treatment term. Results The IEQ scores were higher in Japan than in Canada. Through multiple regression analysis, IEQ scores were independently correlated with treatment terms. The optimal cutoff point of the IEQ scores for a prolonged treatment term was 21 and 22 points, respectively. Conclusions The IEQ scores were associated with treatment terms in patients with acute WAD in Japan.

show abstract

“…However, the methodological quality was often found to be poor because a factor analysis was not conducted 35 , 36 , 42 or because the sample size was small. Ceiling and fl oor effects were tested in 11 versions, but only a Japanese study 35 found a fl oor effect. Only the Polish version 39 described the Bland and Altman method for agreement, and only the Korean 36 and Polish versions 39 performed an "area under the curve" analysis, which showed good responsiveness.…”

Section: Methodology Used In the Measurement Propertiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…There was only 1 back translator for the Catalan, 26 Finnish, 28 French, 29 , 30 Greek, 31 Japanese, 35 Korean, 37 Polish, 39 Spanish, 40 , 41 Thai 43 and Turkish 48 versions. The Chinese 27 and Polish 39 versions did not report if the back translator was a native English speaker, and the Japanese 34 version did not report if the back translators were blinded to the original scale.…”

Section: Quality Assessment Of the Cross-cultural Adaptation Of The Ndimentioning

confidence: 99%

A Systematic Review of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Neck Disability Index

Yao

Sun

Cao

et al. 2015

Spine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the Neck Disability Index

Cited by 32 publications

References 18 publications

Psychometric properties of the global rating of change scales in patients with neck disorders: a systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression

Psychometric properties of the global rating of change scales in patients with neck disorders: a systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression

Associations between the injustice experience questionnaire and treatment term in patients with acute Whiplash-associated disorder in Japan: Comparison with Canadian data

A Systematic Review of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Neck Disability Index

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About