2015
DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000000788
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Systematic Review of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Neck Disability Index

Abstract: 1.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding dynamometry, previous studies report ICCs of 0.85 or greater [21,42]. ICC values for the NDI are similar to those reported in the literature, but the MDC is lower [43,44], what could be related to the low mean scores for the NDI in the present study. ICCs for the TSK were greater than those found in a previous study (ICC = 0.69) [45].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Regarding dynamometry, previous studies report ICCs of 0.85 or greater [21,42]. ICC values for the NDI are similar to those reported in the literature, but the MDC is lower [43,44], what could be related to the low mean scores for the NDI in the present study. ICCs for the TSK were greater than those found in a previous study (ICC = 0.69) [45].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The instrument of NDI is an alteration of ODI, containing 10 items scoring from 0 (no activity limitations) to 5 (major activity limitations). The NDI score is converted to a percentage by doubling the sum of 10 items and can be used to assess disability [ 29 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NDI composed of items which measure self-perceived disability from neck pain. Each item was recorded out of 5 for a total score of 50 [25]. Each question has six answers from 0 to 5, and the patient make a mark in each section, which most closely described their problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%