2000
DOI: 10.1067/mhj.2000.108832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valsartan in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial (VALIANT): Rationale and design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
88
0
6

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
88
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…However, despite the importance of this topic, there are few studies focusing on this issue, and they have shown controversial results (30,33,41) This fact could be clinically relevant in the treatment of patients with MI and may also explain several discrepancies concerning its beneficial effects. Clinical trials, such as the Optimal Trial in Myocardial Infarction with Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (8), Valsartan in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial (28), and Losartan Heart Failure Survival Trial (29), have shown that AT 1 R blockers reduced the morbidity/mortality rate and are well tolerated in patients with MI (34). In patients with heart failure who do not have markedly altered cardiac contractility, AT 1 R blockers appears to have no clinical advantages over placebo treatment (23,44).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite the importance of this topic, there are few studies focusing on this issue, and they have shown controversial results (30,33,41) This fact could be clinically relevant in the treatment of patients with MI and may also explain several discrepancies concerning its beneficial effects. Clinical trials, such as the Optimal Trial in Myocardial Infarction with Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (8), Valsartan in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial (28), and Losartan Heart Failure Survival Trial (29), have shown that AT 1 R blockers reduced the morbidity/mortality rate and are well tolerated in patients with MI (34). In patients with heart failure who do not have markedly altered cardiac contractility, AT 1 R blockers appears to have no clinical advantages over placebo treatment (23,44).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients were randomly assigned to receive valsartan (160 mg twice daily), captopril (50 mg 3 times a day), or both (80 mg of valsartan twice daily and 50 mg of captopril 3 times a day). 15,16 All of the patients gave written informed consent, and the research protocol was approved by the appropriate institutional review boards.…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Увеличение частоты применения статинов в по-следние 15 лет было показано в ряде российских и международных исследований. Так, по данным ис-следования VALIANT, в 2001 г. лишь 0,6 % россиян, перенесших острый ИМ, получали терапию статина-ми [30], в 2002 г. в исследовании АТР частота приема статинов составляла 11 % [15], в 2006-2008 гг., по дан-ным исследований MSS и ОСКАР, в г. Москве стати-ны получали в среднем 30 % всех нуждавшихся в них [12,14], в 2007 г. в исследовании РЕЛИФ уже 33,9 % [9-11], а в международном регистре CLARIFY, за-вершившемся в 2015 г. [29], частота приема статинов в целом по стране составила 88 %.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified