2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-15509-3_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valuation of Procurement Flexibility in the Machinery and Equipment Industry Using the Real Option Approach

Abstract: The increasingly uncertain business environment requires the necessity to implement more flexibility in companies. Unfortunately, companies being specialized in engineer-to-order production cannot use safety stocks which are generally used in make-to-stock productions to secure flexibility. Therefore, an alternative approach has to be developed to facilitate procurement flexibility for these companies. In this paper, firstly the current situation of production networks of machine tool and equipment manufacture… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite their differences, the studies by Benaroch et al (2010), Wu et al (2001), and Klaus et al (2014) have an essential property in common with our objective: Due to the trend toward highly individualized products, we consider a company that applies an MTO approach with no production of stock, which is similar to those authors' application context of ITservices that cannot be physically stored. In the context of manufacturing, we found only one other paper that uses ROA to evaluate temporal capacity expansion of companies with MTO approaches: Kleinert and Stich (2010) address companies in the machinery and equipment industry that source subcomponents from suppliers. As unforeseen problems might occur during the manufacturing process, these authors recommend that such companies consider the purchase of additional expansion options from their suppliers.…”
Section: Investment Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite their differences, the studies by Benaroch et al (2010), Wu et al (2001), and Klaus et al (2014) have an essential property in common with our objective: Due to the trend toward highly individualized products, we consider a company that applies an MTO approach with no production of stock, which is similar to those authors' application context of ITservices that cannot be physically stored. In the context of manufacturing, we found only one other paper that uses ROA to evaluate temporal capacity expansion of companies with MTO approaches: Kleinert and Stich (2010) address companies in the machinery and equipment industry that source subcomponents from suppliers. As unforeseen problems might occur during the manufacturing process, these authors recommend that such companies consider the purchase of additional expansion options from their suppliers.…”
Section: Investment Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Private information that the other companies do not possess is very important to implement one's own optimal actions in the supply chain coordination. Due to the high uncertainty in manufacturing process, a method to increase the flexibility needs to be used (Kleinert and Stich 2010). One method increasing suppliers' flexibility that has been used in recent years is ROA (Lander and Pinches 1998).…”
Section: Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%