2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2009.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valuation of tropical forest services and mechanisms to finance their conservation and sustainable use: A case study of Tapantí National Park, Costa Rica

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
28
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of non-market valuation methods, including Revealed Preference (RP) and State Preference (SP) methods, have been developed [9,13]. Studies using these non-market valuation methods have assessed global and regional ES and their contribution to human well-being [1,7,[14][15][16][17]. Compared to the RP methods (e.g., production-oriented valuation, replace cost method, hedonic prices method), the SP methods use hypothetical scenarios involving ES to elicit individuals' responses to ES improvements and observe their behavior of interest [9,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of non-market valuation methods, including Revealed Preference (RP) and State Preference (SP) methods, have been developed [9,13]. Studies using these non-market valuation methods have assessed global and regional ES and their contribution to human well-being [1,7,[14][15][16][17]. Compared to the RP methods (e.g., production-oriented valuation, replace cost method, hedonic prices method), the SP methods use hypothetical scenarios involving ES to elicit individuals' responses to ES improvements and observe their behavior of interest [9,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beberapa penelitian menggunakan metode CVM atau WTP untuk mengungkapkan nilai ekonomi lingkungan ekowisata untuk kebijakan dan pengelolaan sumber daya alam di kawasan lindung/konservasi di negara berkembang, dan perbaikan lingkungan (Hizami, Rusli, & Alias, 2014;Kamri, 2013;Nuva, Shamsudin, Radam, & Shuib, 2009), menentukan harga tiket masuk ekowisata (Cheung & Jim, 2014;Nuva et al, 2009;Samdin, 2008), peningkatan kualitas taman dan layanan (Cheung & Jim, 2014;Kolahi, Sakai, Moriya & Aminpour, 2013), diferensiasi produk ekowisata (Cheung & Jim, 2014), pemanfaatan jasa lingkungan berkelanjutan (air minum/pembangkit listrik, pemeliharaan keanekaragaman hayati, pariwisata) dan mekanisme pembiayaan konservasi (Bernard, Groot, & Joaquín, 2009), mengembangkan model pariwisata yang sadar ekonomi, lingkungan, dan budaya ekowisata (Sekar, Weiss, & Dobson, 2013).…”
Section: Penelitian Terdahuluunclassified
“…Faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi WTP yang digunakan berdasarkan penelitian terdahulu, yaitu karakteristik sosial ekonomi, serta faktor yang dapat dikendalikan seperti pengetahuan ekowisata, dan aktif di organisasi lingkungan (Banapon, 2008;Bernard et al, 2009;Cheung & Jim, 2014;Hizami et al, 2014;Kamri, 2013;Khan, 2006;Kolahi et al, 2013;Nuva et al, 2009;Samdin, 2008;Sekar, et al, 2013). Sebelum mewawancarai wisatawan untuk mengidentifikasi nilai WTP, ditentukan nilai dasar WTP dari anggaran biaya konservasi TNGR.…”
Section: Metode Penelitianunclassified
See 2 more Smart Citations