2017 Ieee Africon 2017
DOI: 10.1109/afrcon.2017.8095569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value co-creation in entrepreneurial ecosystems: Learnings from a Norwegian perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our sample is comprised of a special group of persons that researchers could not easily reach (that is, entrepreneurs with persistence experiences in the premise of area change or not in ecology-related industries), and for the nature of the study is exploratory, this seems to be a necessary evil. Latter studies may also extend the unit-of-analysis up to entrepreneurial groups "fit" in knowledge and cognitions [39,40] to see how they can co-create values during area transition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, our sample is comprised of a special group of persons that researchers could not easily reach (that is, entrepreneurs with persistence experiences in the premise of area change or not in ecology-related industries), and for the nature of the study is exploratory, this seems to be a necessary evil. Latter studies may also extend the unit-of-analysis up to entrepreneurial groups "fit" in knowledge and cognitions [39,40] to see how they can co-create values during area transition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the innovation ecosystem perspective has gained traction among researchers of IPs (5,(30)(31)(32). This is because it offers unique opportunities for investigating the dynamics of these innovation architectures, particularly with regard to the interconnected nature of stakeholders of innovation and the evolutionary nature of these stakeholder networks (5,6,(33)(34)(35). This is of relevance to the proposed research because of the evolution observed in IPs, which has practical implications regarding platform governance, facilitation, focus and participating actors (19,20,22,36).…”
Section: Researchers[gsp[1]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the innovation ecosystem perspective has gained traction among researchers of IPs [17,[40][41][42]. This is because it offers unique opportunities for investigating the dynamics of these innovation architectures, particularly with regard to the interconnected nature of stakeholders of innovation and the evolutionary nature of these stakeholder networks [17,18,[43][44][45]. This is of relevance to the proposed research because of the evolution observed in IPs, which has practical implications regarding platform governance, facilitation, focus and participating actors [13,15,16,46].…”
Section: Conceptual Review Of Innovation Platformsmentioning
confidence: 99%