Value engineering application in a high rise building (a case study in Bali)

Arumsari, Putri; Tanachi, Ricco

doi:10.1088/1755-1315/195/1/012015

Cited by 9 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The evidence shows that VE can help eradicate quality loss by evaluating the substitute design solutions at the early project stage. For instance, Arumsari and Tanachi (2018) found that VE could save up to 8% of TPC in high-rise buildings by delivering the same quality if applied in the design phase. Therefore, the VE process can be carried out as a prevention activity to achieve cost effectiveness with required quality standards.…”

Section: Coc Versus Vfmentioning

confidence: 99%

Quantifying the cost of quality in construction projects: an insight into the base of the iceberg

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Construction projects are complex endeavors where achieving higher quality standards is challenging due to the intrinsic difficulties and dynamic quality management processes. Several quality management techniques exist to overcome quality concerns, such as the cost of quality (COQ). However, implementing COQ in building construction is challenging due to the absence of a comprehensive quality cost-capturing system. Several studies have tried to quantify different quality costs but are mainly focused on visible failure cost—the tip of the iceberg while the base of the iceberg has rarely been explored. This study develops and quantifies each component of the visible and hidden quality costs—the base of the iceberg. Accordingly, a modified prevention, appraisal, and failure model is developed and applied to the primary data of 25 building projects. The findings highlight the unfamiliarity and passive attitude of the involved construction firms towards quality, thus, incurring higher failure costs amounting to over 12% of the total project cost. Most of this cost remains hidden as traditional accounting systems cannot capture it. Such costs must be eliminated by implementing COQ systems as utilized in the current study. Further, a quality costing framework is established for building projects and applied to the local construction industry to reduce construction failures and improve the quality performance of building projects.

show abstract

Section: Coc Versus Vfmentioning

confidence: 99%

Quantifying the cost of quality in construction projects: an insight into the base of the iceberg

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Dalam studi kasus ini metode Penggunaan Metode Paired Comparison pada Pekerjaan Pondasi Bangunan Gedung dengan Pendekatan Value Engineering (VE) Nanda et al (2023) paired comparison digunakan untuk membandingkan pekerjaan dengan pendekatan Value Engineering (VE) atau rekayasa nilai. Arumsari & Tanachi (2018) mengatakan VE merupakan pendekatan yang sistematis dan terstruktur dengan tujuan untuk mengurangi biaya tetapi tetap mempertahankan kualitas dari pekerjaan. Dalam perhitungan analisis rekayasa nilai dengan menggunakan metode paired comparison dibuatkan list atau daftar kriteria dari masingmasing alternatif untuk dicari bobot serta indeks dan dibuatkan matriks evaluasi agar dapat ditentukan masing-masing alternatif (Iswati, 2017).…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Metode Paired Comparison Pada Pekerjaan Pondasi Bangunan Gedung Dengan Pendekatan Studi Value Engineering (Ve)

Nanda

Riswanto

Kurniawati

2023

j. mitra teknik sipil

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Foundation work is one of the most crucial jobs in building construction. Therefore, an appropriate method is needed to determine the most effective and efficient type of foundation. One of the methods used is the paired comparison method with a value engineering approach. In this case study, the paired comparison method is used to compare the square pile foundation (existing) with the use of a triangular pile design and round piles. The total budget is Rp. 3.834.143,026,84. The analysis shows that the D-300 round pile foundation has the highest cost among the three with a total budget of 4.522.511.665.00. Based on the design scenario, square foundation work is superior in the financing, implementation time, amount of labor, concrete quality, and weather conditions in the field with a total value of 54% than the triangular and round pile foundations. Hence the final decision remains to use a square pile foundation. Abstrak Pekerjaan pondasi merupakan salah satu pekerjaan yang krusial dalam pembangunan gedung. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan metode yang tepat untuk menentukan jenis pondasi yang paling efektif dan efisien. Salah satu metode yang digunakan adalah metode paired comparison dengan pendekatan value engineering. Dalam studi kasus ini metode paired comparison digunakan untuk membandingkan pondasi tiang pancang persegi (eksisting) dengan penggunaan desain tiang pancang berbentuk segitiga dan bulat. Total anggaran dana yaitu Rp. 3.834.143.026,84. Hasil analisis menunjukan bahwasanya pondasi pancang bulat D-300 memiliki biaya yang paling tinggi diantara ketiganya dengan total anggaran 4.522.511.665,00. Berdasarkan skenario desain bahwa pekerjaan pondasi persegi lebih unggul dari segi pembiayaan, waktu pelaksanaan, jumlah tenaga kerja, mutu beton serta kondisi cuaca di lapangan dengan total nilai 54% dari pada pondasi tiang pancang berbentuk segitiga dan berbentuk bulat. Oleh karena itu keputusan akhir tetap menggunakan pondasi tiang pancang persegi.

show abstract

“…Tujuan utama penciptaan suatu produk pada dasarnya adalah untuk memberikan kepuasan kepada konsumen (Baiquni & Ishak, 2019). Persaingan antar perusahaan yang memproduksi produk sejenis menuntut diperlukannya strategi manajemen perusahaan dalam memproduksi produknya agar perusahaan dapat tetap bertahan dalam persaingan dalam memperoleh keuntungan dalam produksinya (Arumsari & Tanachi, 2018). Langkah-langkah yang harus segera diambil perusahaan untuk mengatasi hal di atas yaitu dengan melakukan efisiensi dalam penggunaan sumber daya ekonomi dan usaha terus menerus dalam perbaikan produk dan peningkatan konsumen.…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Value Engineering Analysis of Decorative Lightning in Product Development

Yusuf

Parwati

Nasution

2021

tekinfo

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Currently, the sales of decorative lighting products are very low because the design of decorative lights are less attractive to consumers. Therefore, the company must develop the product to produce quality products that are updated and attractive to consumers. This research aims to develop the decorative light products using value engineering. Value engineering was used to increase benefits withoutt increasing costs, reducing costs without reducing benefits, or a combination of both. This research was conducted to find out the level of efficiency that can be achieved from several recommended alternatives. Research results showed that the value of the initial design (Product A) was 3,48 x 10-7; product B was 3,16 x 10-7; and product C was 8,83 x 10-7. The use of raw materials has also changed from its initial design which was using a mixture of copper and brass with a thickness of 0,8 mm to an alternative design by using a mixture of copper and brass with a thickness of 0,5 mm. In addition, the study showed that product C are more preferable for consumers. Keywords: decorative lighting, product development, pairwise comparison, value engineering

show abstract

Value engineering application in a high rise building (a case study in Bali)

Cited by 9 publications

References 2 publications

Quantifying the cost of quality in construction projects: an insight into the base of the iceberg

Quantifying the cost of quality in construction projects: an insight into the base of the iceberg

Metode Paired Comparison Pada Pekerjaan Pondasi Bangunan Gedung Dengan Pendekatan Studi Value Engineering (Ve)

Value Engineering Analysis of Decorative Lightning in Product Development

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About