2017
DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2017.1302068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value for money in energy efficiency retrofits in Ireland: grant provider and grant recipients

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The highest improvement in energy efficiency per unit grant expenditure is associated with heating system upgrades, followed by attic insulation, followed by wall insulation. This finding is in line with the findings of Collins and Curtis (2017b) for grants targeting higher income households. For heating system upgrades a 1 percent increase in grant expenditure, on average, is associated with 0.12 kWh/m 2 /year improvement in BER rating.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The highest improvement in energy efficiency per unit grant expenditure is associated with heating system upgrades, followed by attic insulation, followed by wall insulation. This finding is in line with the findings of Collins and Curtis (2017b) for grants targeting higher income households. For heating system upgrades a 1 percent increase in grant expenditure, on average, is associated with 0.12 kWh/m 2 /year improvement in BER rating.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The coefficient estimates associated with ‘E’, ‘F’ and ‘G’ rated properties are all statistically significant, indicating greater levels of improvement among the least energy efficient properties. This shows that the grant scheme is achieving the greatest energy efficiency improvements within the most energy inefficient properties, a finding consistent with other energy retrofit grant studies ( Hoicka et al, 2014 ; Webber et al, 2015 ; Collins and Curtis, 2017b ; Liddell, 2015 ; Elsharkawy and Rutherford, 2018 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The expected costs and heat energy saving of retrofitting from one BER rating to another requires further investigation. The retrofit cost data is based upon AECOM (2013) and Ali et al (2020) and the expected energy saving is based upon Collins and Curtis (2017). For this reason, the model uses a simplistic retrofitting options.…”
Section: Future Technology Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%