2016
DOI: 10.15358/0344-1369-2016-3-135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value-in-Use: Antecedents, Dimensions, and Consequences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the mediated relationships between pull-and push-LBA are more salient among consumers of low PSE (vs high PSE) and Gen Z (vs other generations). The findings reflect the importance of supplier and customer resources as well as their integration in the value co-creation process (Bartelheimer, 2020;Bruns and Jacob, 2016;Eggert et al, 2018;Macdonald et al, 2016); they also advance the LBA literature in clarifying the boundary conditions for the effectiveness of LBA.…”
Section: Findings and Academic Contributionssupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the mediated relationships between pull-and push-LBA are more salient among consumers of low PSE (vs high PSE) and Gen Z (vs other generations). The findings reflect the importance of supplier and customer resources as well as their integration in the value co-creation process (Bartelheimer, 2020;Bruns and Jacob, 2016;Eggert et al, 2018;Macdonald et al, 2016); they also advance the LBA literature in clarifying the boundary conditions for the effectiveness of LBA.…”
Section: Findings and Academic Contributionssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Although there is no well-recognized structure of value-in-use of technology-based services, the common dimensions that emerge from most studies include the concepts of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. For example, technical dimension, decision support of functional dimension, channel functionality of spatial dimension and temporal efficiency/usefulness and speediness of temporal dimension in Heinonen (2009) and Heinonen and Strandvik (2009), performance value in Gummerus and Pihlström (2011), professionalism/need for achievement, productivity and personal self-fulfillment in Bruns and Jacob (2014, 2016), and level of a user’s performance in Hartwig and Jacob (2018) all are related to the extent to which the outcome of a service usage helps users to achieve their goals, improve their daily tasks, pursue their interests, or solve their problems effectively and reliably, which reflect the concept of perceived usefulness. Further, process easiness/functionality of functional dimension, spatial latitude and navigation of spatial dimension and temporal latitude of temporal dimension in Heinonen (2009) and Heinonen and Strandvik (2009), convenience value in Gummerus and Pihlström (2011), convenience and flexibility/independence in Bruns and Jacob (2014), and use process ubiquity, individual effort required and level of use process adaptability in Hartwig and Jacob (2018) all pertain to the ease, effortlessness and smoothness of using a service and aligns with the idea of perceived ease of use.…”
Section: Literature and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SAT demonstrates the perceptions of customers with products and services that service providers provided (Oliver, 2014). VIU plays an important role in reinforcing feelings, including SAT and trust (Bruns and Jacob, 2016). Da Silva et al (2022) demonstrated that students who use education services and have their expectations exceeded will be satisfied and, thus, perceive the consequences of these services delivered as facilitating their process or rather will realize VIU.…”
Section: Research Model and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Instead, existing e-service ViU research streams are dedicated to the examination of ViU antecedents (e.g., Bruns & Jacob, 2016;Chen & Dubinsky, 2003;Kleijnen et al, 2007), e-service design (e.g., Blaschke et al, 2019;Schmidt-Rauch & Schwabe, 2014;Sousa et al, 2008), customer participation (e.g., Heinonen, 2006bHeinonen, , 2009Heinonen & Strandvik, 2009) and e-service ecosystems (e.g., Beverungen et al, 2017;Grieger & Ludwig, 2019;Hein et al, 2019Hein et al, , 2020, and from these streams, several ViU conceptualizations have emerged. In accordance with the e-service literature's longstanding focus on service quality, e-service ViU is commonly based on a benefit/sacrifice understanding (e.g., Cho & Menor, 2010;Heinonen, 2004Heinonen, , 2006a, which contrasts with Macdonald et al's (2016) goal-oriented ViU perspective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%