Purpose:To compare contrast characteristics and image quality of 1.0 M gadobutrol with 0.5 M Gd-DTPA for timeresolved three-dimensional pulmonary magnetic resonance angiography (MRA).
Materials and Methods:Thirty-one patients and five healthy volunteers were examined with a contrast-enhanced time-resolved pulmonary MRA protocol (fast lowangle shot [FLASH] three-dimensional, TR/TE ϭ 2.2/1.0 msec, flip angle: 25°, scan time per three-dimensional data set ϭ 5.6 seconds). Patients were randomized to receive either 0.1 mmol/kg body weight (bw) or 0.2 mmol/kg bw gadobutrol, or 0.2 mmol/kg bw Gd-DTPA. Volunteers were examined three times, twice with 0.2 mmol/kg bw gadobutrol using two different flip angles and once with 0.2 mmol/kg bw Gd-DTPA. All contrast injections were performed at a rate of 5 mL/second. Image analysis included signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) measurements in lung arteries and veins, as well as a subjective analysis of image quality.
Results:In patients, significantly higher SNR and CNR were observed with Gd-DTPA compared to both doses of gadobutrol ; P Յ 0.05). No relevant differences were observed between 0.1 mmol/kg bw and 0.2 mmol/kg bw gadobutrol. In volunteers, gadobutrol and Gd-DTPA achieved similar SNR and CNR. A significantly higher SNR and CNR was observed for gadobutrol-enhanced MRA with an increased flip angle of 40°. Image quality was rated equal for both contrast agents.
Conclusion:No relevant advantages of 1.0 M gadobutrol over 0.5 M Gd-DTPA were observed for time-resolved pulmonary MRA in this study. Potential explanations are T2/ T2*-effects caused by the high intravascular concentration when using high injection rates. CONTRAST-ENHANCED three-dimensional pulmonary magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) has been proposed as a non-invasive and non-ionizing imaging modality for the evaluation of pulmonary vascular diseases (1-7). In addition to conventional monophasic protocols, time-resolved multiphasic pulmonary MRA has been proposed (6 -12). Depending on the temporal resolution and bolus timing, time-resolved pulmonary MRA typically provides different phases of contrastenhancement: a predominantly arterial phase, followed by a mixed arteriovenous phase, a predominantly venous phase, and a systemic arterial phase. One major advantage of time-resolved MRA over monophasic protocols is the improved arterial-venous discrimination of lung vessels (9 -12). Previous studies have shown that the quality of arterial-venous discrimination is influenced by the injection volume of contrast media, with a smaller injection volume producing a faster onset of peak enhancement and faster complete washout at no cost of maximum signal (10).Recently, new contrast agents offering an increased gadolinium concentration or a higher T1 relaxivity have been proposed for contrast-enhanced MRA (13-17). Due to the increased gadolinium concentration of 1.0 M gadobutrol, the injection volume can be halved compared to equimolar dosages of standard 0.5 M Gd-DTPA. The increased Gd concentr...