2020
DOI: 10.1002/agg2.20013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value of composite Normalized Difference Vegetative Index and growing degree days data in Oklahoma, 1999 to 2018

Abstract: For over 25 yr, sensor-based Normalized Difference Vegetative Index (NDVI) data has been collected from both satellite imagery and near-plant (3-m) readings. Because calibrated NDVI data coming from active sensors is still relatively new, limited research has returned to evaluate databases including multiple years and environments. Composite NDVI readings and final grain yield were collected from 1999 to 2018. This included growing degree day (GDD) records for each mid-season sensor measurement. This was attem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For each Period, mean maximum and minimum, absolute maximum and minimum temperatures were prepared as predictor variables (features) that would help indicate heat or frost occurrence that could impact yield negatively; particularly pertinent at critical growth stages such as anthesis [ 46 ]. Growing degree days (GDD) corresponding to the imagery dates were also calculated and included as predictor variable [ 47 ]. Two rainfall datasets were prepared: rainfall depth (mm) in the preceding Period and cumulative rainfall depth (mm) since sowing date.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each Period, mean maximum and minimum, absolute maximum and minimum temperatures were prepared as predictor variables (features) that would help indicate heat or frost occurrence that could impact yield negatively; particularly pertinent at critical growth stages such as anthesis [ 46 ]. Growing degree days (GDD) corresponding to the imagery dates were also calculated and included as predictor variable [ 47 ]. Two rainfall datasets were prepared: rainfall depth (mm) in the preceding Period and cumulative rainfall depth (mm) since sowing date.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Figueiredo et al (2020) and Dhillon et al (2020a) deduced that a GDD-based numerical scale could be used for predicting topdress N rate in winter wheat, instead of subjective morphological scales. They further mentioned the ideal window for topdress N prediction was between 80−115 GDDs.…”
Section: Core Ideasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional uses of GDD include hybrid maturity descriptor by the seed industry; quantifying crop yields as affected by planting dates (Bollero, Bullock, & Hollinger, 1996); predicting N availability and losses from manure (Griffin & Honeycutt, 2000); and grain yield prediction. (Dhillon et al, 2020a;Figueiredo et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%