2011
DOI: 10.1002/jcu.20841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value of contrast‐enhanced sonography with micro flow imaging in the diagnosis of prostate cancer

Abstract: Some MFI patterns had high positive predictive values and were associated with more aggressive cancers. This could be used to reduce the number of biopsy sites and detect clinically significant cancers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also identified small prostate volume and small TZ volume of the prostate as significant risk factors for high-grade PCa in the simple logistic regression analysis; however, they were not significant by multiple logistic regression analysis. Another study suggested that the results of contrast-enhanced sonography with micro flow imaging are associated with the aggressiveness of PCa [18]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also identified small prostate volume and small TZ volume of the prostate as significant risk factors for high-grade PCa in the simple logistic regression analysis; however, they were not significant by multiple logistic regression analysis. Another study suggested that the results of contrast-enhanced sonography with micro flow imaging are associated with the aggressiveness of PCa [18]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is most commonly used to assess blood flow, diagnose disease and measure a treatment effect. Compared with ultrasonography, contrast‐enhanced sonography does not only provide information on tissue configuration and vascularity, but can also differentiate differences in blood flow between normal and pathological tissue quantitatively (Xie et al ., ). Studies showed that contrast‐enhanced sonography can differentiate tumour vascularity in a prostate cancer animal model (Lee et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…At present, few studies have reported the possibility of detecting PCa using three‐section CETRUS. In a previously published study, Xie and colleagues reported their findings using three‐section CETRUS with micro flow imaging technique. They found that by site the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV for micro flow imaging were 81.1%, 84.3%, 83.3%, 68.6%, and 91.3%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of disagreement, another senior sonologist would review all the images until a consensus was achieved. Sonologists used the following criteria on the basis of our clinical experience and previous literature: TRUS: (1) focal hypoechoic foci in the peripheral zone (PZ); (2) asymmetric bulging of contours; (3) ill‐defined separation between PZ and transition zone (TZ); (4) focal asymmetric/increased flow on PDUS. CETRUS: (1) stronger or faster contrast enhancement compared with adjacent parenchyma; (2) no or low enhancement; (3) indistinct separation between the inner and outer glands; (4) asymmetry of intraprostatic vessels. Additionally, to measure the maximum diameter of suspicious lesions on each imaging, methods used successfully in our previous study were applied .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%