2011
DOI: 10.1080/15323269.2011.558882
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value of Health Sciences Library Resources and Services to Health Care Providers in Medium and Large Communities Across Two Mid-Continental States

Abstract: 141 patient management decisions, changing of tests, or changing of therapy. Medical providers indicated that health sciences libraries were of value for a large variety of uses, including changing and confirming patient management decisions and reducing length of stay.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Readers are referred to that paper for details of the Rochester study methods and measures and the updates to the current study made by the planning group, as well as references to earlier literature on the value and impact of library and information services in patient care. Since 2009, several more studies have been published, including the Sievert et al study on the value of library resources to health care providers in two mid-continental states [4], the Jemison et al study on return on investment in Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) libraries [5], the Aitken et al study on clinical librarians at the point of care [6], and the McGowan et al study on the impact of librarianprovided information in primary care [7]. The current study also drew on previous impact research conducted by Urquhart et al in the National Health Service in the United Kingdom [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Readers are referred to that paper for details of the Rochester study methods and measures and the updates to the current study made by the planning group, as well as references to earlier literature on the value and impact of library and information services in patient care. Since 2009, several more studies have been published, including the Sievert et al study on the value of library resources to health care providers in two mid-continental states [4], the Jemison et al study on return on investment in Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) libraries [5], the Aitken et al study on clinical librarians at the point of care [6], and the McGowan et al study on the impact of librarianprovided information in primary care [7]. The current study also drew on previous impact research conducted by Urquhart et al in the National Health Service in the United Kingdom [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Papers by Hershey, Kaufman, Aabo, ALIA, Bryant and Allen were assessed as informative but of variable quality and lacking in adequate supporting evidence. Gardois, Medernach, Marshall, Gray and Sievert provided evidence of the intangible benefits or the intrinsic value of clinical libraries but did not identify relevant values or costs of service delivery. Given the recent interest in ‘value of information’ in reducing uncertainty, methods and benchmarks for evaluating ROI in relation to these benefits are emerging.…”
Section: Excluded Papersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The library/information service uses evidence to demonstrate the link between services and resources and patient care and safety, patient education/consumer health & health information literacy, quality improvement indicators, health professional education, and other important institutional functions [ 80 ]. This relationship is communicated effectively to upper management and stakeholders.…”
Section: Standard Nine: Value and Advocacymentioning
confidence: 99%