2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value of the Bronchodilator Response in Assessing Controller Naïve Asthmatic Children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
39
1
6

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
7
39
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…According to this criterion, it was found that 47 (34.1%) of 138 children with asthma exhibited a positive BDR. This is in line with previous reports that a large proportion of patients with asthma do not show a positive BDR, which strengthens the suggestion that BDR provides only modest sensitivity in confirming the diagnosis of asthma [21].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to this criterion, it was found that 47 (34.1%) of 138 children with asthma exhibited a positive BDR. This is in line with previous reports that a large proportion of patients with asthma do not show a positive BDR, which strengthens the suggestion that BDR provides only modest sensitivity in confirming the diagnosis of asthma [21].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…TANTISIRA et al [20] reported a mean BDR of 10.07% among the 1,041 participants in the Childhood Asthma Management Program. GALANT et al [21] observed various mean BDRs according to clinical severity, ranging from 7.3 (mild intermittent group) to 10.1% (severe persistent group).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11---16 However, the studies that included preschooler spirometry reported only FEV 1 12---15 and in two of them, spirometry was performed using standardised criteria for adults. 12,15 The objective of the present study was to evaluate the utility of measured bronchodilator response to short beta-2 agonists for asthma diagnosis in Chilean preschoolers using spirometry standardised for this specific age group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Die Aussagekraft von FEV 1 als Parameter für den Schweregrad bei kindlichem Asthma wird in pädiatrischen Kreisen seit einiger Zeit kontrovers diskutiert [6,7,8]. Ein Grund, warum der FEV 1 -Wert auch bei Kindern mit schwerer Behinderung der Atemwege normal bleibt, könnte die Tatsache sein, dass bei Kindern der Durchmesser der Atemwege im Vergleich zum Lungenvolumen grösser ist als bei Erwachsenen.…”
Section: Resultateunclassified