Value‐Orientation Analysis: The Adaptation of an Anthropological Model for Counseling Research

Chapman, Ann

doi:10.1002/j.2164-4918.1981.tb00493.x

Cited by 14 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Acknowledging that there are many models within cognitive-behavioral, psychoanalytic, and humanistic orientations, the consensus of theorists who have examined these theoretical models in connection with Kluckhohn's model (see Beutler & Bergan, 1991;Chapman, 1981;Remer & Remer, 1982)is that the cognitive-behavioral counselor places primacy on individual goals, has a doing orientation that emphasizes measurable accomplishments, and views humans as mastering nature. The psychoanalytic counselor places primacy on individual goals, prefers activities that result in integration of the self through control, and views humans as being subjugated to nature.…”

Section: Theoretical Orientations and Value-orientationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Practitioners' Value‐Orientation: Examination of Core Values and Influence of Theoretical Orientation

Mahalik

1995

Counseling and Values

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Examining Kluckhohn's Value-Orientation Model applied to counseling practitioners, the author hypothesized that practitioners would (a) endorse alternatives within value-orientations according to their counseling orientation, and (b) as a group, endorse certain alternatives within value-orientations over others. One hundred and nineteen practitioners who identified themselves as either cognitivebehavioral, psychoanalytic, humanistic, or family-systems oriented completed the Intercultural Values Inventory (Carter & Helms, 1990). Repeated measures analyses of variance failed to find between-group differences examining theoretical orientation, but found that practitioners, as a group, endorsed certain alternatives within value-orientations over others, and these reflected humanistic values. The lack of differences between counseling orientations, the idea of a practitioner culture, limitations, and future research arediscussed.Practitioners' values are increasingly recognized as shaping the goals, tasks, and outcomes of counseling (Bergin

show abstract

Section: Theoretical Orientations and Value-orientationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Practitioners' Value‐Orientation: Examination of Core Values and Influence of Theoretical Orientation

Mahalik

1995

Counseling and Values

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Of the various approaches to studying values across cultures (e.g., Parsons & Shils, 1951;Rokeach, 1979), counseling researchers and theorists (Carter, 1990;Carter & Helms, 1987, 1990Chapman, 1981;Ibrahim, 1985b;Sue & Sue, 1990) have turned to the Kluckhohn and Strodtbeck model of value-orientations to explore and explicate the role and influence of cultural values in mental health theory, research, and practice.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Cultural Values: A Review of Empirical Research and Implications for Counseling

Carter

1991

Jour of Counseling & Develop

108

116

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this review, empirical investigations that followed the Kluckhohn and Strodtbeck model of value‐orientations are presented. The review finds between‐group as well as within‐group variations in cultural values. The author also discusses how an understanding of cultural values can enrich cross‐cultural effectiveness. En este repaso se presenta las investigaciones que utilizaron el modelo Kluckhohn y Strodtbeck de evaluación orientativa. Se encuentran variaciones de valores culturales inter e intra grupo. Elautor también discute la manera en que el conocimiento de valores culturales puede mejorar la efectividad intercultural.

show abstract

“…Although other, more recent schemata are available, the Kluckhohn method has both a rich history (e.g., Sue & Sue, 1990) and a common sense (i.e., a shared, generally understood) set of labels and approach to discussing deeper level, cultural value structures in a manner that approximates connotational neutrality. Although this approach has limitations (e.g., orientations/spheres are not independent), it also has the benefit of having been extended to address the impact of these types of values structures on individuals (Carter, 1990;Carter & Helms, 1990;Green & Haymes, 1973), families (Papajohn, 1993;Ponce, 1993), organizations (e.g., Russo, 1999), and psychological theories (Chapman, 1981;R. Remer & Remer, 1982).…”

Section: Structure For the Content Analysismentioning

confidence: 98%

Cultural Nuances, Assumptions, and the Butterfly Effect: Addressing the Unpredictability Caused by Unconscious Values Structures in Cross‐Cultural Interactions

Remer

2007

Counseling and Values

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cultural values, cross-cultural interaction patterns that are produced by dynamical (chaotic) systems, have a significant impact on interaction, particularly among and between people from different cultures. The butterfly effect, which states that small differences in initial conditions may have severe consequences for patterns in the long run, serves as a creative way of drawing attention to a particularly challenging aspect of such chaotic systems. Forty-six accounts of cross-cultural situations involving the interface of Asian and Western cultures were examined for underlying nuances (using Kluckhohn values orientations; F. R. Kluckhohn & F. L. Strodtbeck, 1961) and their possible effects. The discrepant relational perspective contributed the most to interaction difficulties but was not independent of other spheres. It is the last day in Taipei, Taiwan, for a yearlong visitor. He has a plane to catch and much to do-packing, closing bank accounts, mailing belongings, leave takings. Having been invited for a last lunch by a colleague, he heads back to his office to drop off some gifts when his hostess catches him and frantically spirits him across the city. He arrives to find a large number of people just about ready to leave a luncheon, many of whom he does not know. He realizes they have been invited to see him off. He has erred. His hostess and friends have "lost face." Was this all his fault? Why? Hadn't he learned anything during his stay? Will they distrust foreigners in the future, thinking them rude? What will their attitude be toward Americans now? Will their friends attend such gatherings again? However, if he had been on time for the luncheon, he might have missed his plane later that day, and his apartment would have been a mess. What impression would that have left? Should he have known better, planned better?Recognizing that cultural values have a significant impact on interaction, particularly among and between people from different cultures, is nothing new (R.

show abstract

Value‐Orientation Analysis: The Adaptation of an Anthropological Model for Counseling Research

Abstract: This article proposes the adaptation of Florence Kluckhohn's theory of Variation in Value Orientations for use in counseling research. The author summarizes Kluckhohn's theory and presents guidelines for its adaptation.

Cited by 14 publications

References 6 publications

Practitioners' Value‐Orientation: Examination of Core Values and Influence of Theoretical Orientation

Practitioners' Value‐Orientation: Examination of Core Values and Influence of Theoretical Orientation

Cultural Values: A Review of Empirical Research and Implications for Counseling

Cultural Nuances, Assumptions, and the Butterfly Effect: Addressing the Unpredictability Caused by Unconscious Values Structures in Cross‐Cultural Interactions

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About