2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcs.2012.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value-passing CCS with noisy channels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several approaches for verification of sliding window protocols use model checking (see survey [5]) where the message contents are abstracted by symbolic constants or use semi-automated reasoning. While we model noisy channels through non-determinism in the sender's output, these have also been modeled through probabilistic semantics using formalisms of π -calculus [7] and valuepassing CCS with noisy channels [12].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several approaches for verification of sliding window protocols use model checking (see survey [5]) where the message contents are abstracted by symbolic constants or use semi-automated reasoning. While we model noisy channels through non-determinism in the sender's output, these have also been modeled through probabilistic semantics using formalisms of π -calculus [7] and valuepassing CCS with noisy channels [12].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its asynchronous version has been studied by Cao [22]. In order to model some reactive systems in which communication channels are not reliable, an extension of Milner's VCCS in a noisy environment has been recently investigated in [23]. There probabilistic information is used to give a precise characterization of noisy channels, and thus appears only in agent's interpretation (semantics).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%