Values in Life Domains in a Cross-National Perspective

Halman, Loek; Gelissen, J.P.T.M.

doi:10.1007/s11577-019-00602-0

Cited by 25 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, the world development in the XXI century demonstrates a different vector. In modern research concerning value systems in modern society, statements about the growing fragmentation of fundamental social values, the lack of a certain scale of values are updated (Halman & Gelissen, 2019). As a result of globalization processes, the problem of identity blurring is highlighted, and the tendency to form models of multiple identity is revealed (Astafieva, 2016).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Civil Society In Civilizational Dimensions

Semenov¹

2022

European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article presents a look at the problems of civil society development in the XXI century. The relevance of the topic is determined by the growing civic activity, the need to understand the role of civil society in an increasingly complex political sphere, the debatable boundaries of the concept of "civil society". The multiple crises shaking the modern world have highlighted the contradictions generated by the processes of globalization, on the one hand, and the problems of the civilizational complex of national and cultural identity, on the other. The research methodology is based on a civilizational approach to understanding the concept of civil society, which is based on the values of Western European culture, as well as a dialectical approach to understanding the value contradictions of different cultures as a factor of new vectors of the development of the phenomenon of civil society. The originality of the work consists in substantiating the value-based civilizational conflict as a risk factor in the development of the principles of civil society in a culturally complex world. It is argued that the principles of ideological and value-based colonialism have lost any prospects: the clash of cultures and civilizations leads to devastating consequences for the whole world. The search for an alternative is possible as overcoming the value complex of classical liberalism, including in its framework not only civic qualities, but also cultural patterns and norms that accumulate social experience and traditions of non-European cultures.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Civil Society In Civilizational Dimensions

Semenov¹

2022

European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Non-religious spirituality has also been positively correlated with mental health [120,245]. The aspects of religiosity, morality, and spirituality cannot be neglected in psychology [246] due to their established effects on prosocial behavior and the prevention of crime and deviance [247,248]. These three aspects are regarded as the prime sources to unite people and to bring peace, welfare, and prosperity to a society [249][250][251][252].…”

Section: The Religious Moral and Spiritual Aspects Of Mental Healthmentioning

confidence: 99%

Simplifying the Understanding and Measurement of Mental Disorders Thru a Comprehensive Framework of Psychosocial Health

Husain,

Ijaz,

Husain

et al. 2024

OBM Integr Complement Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The assessment of mental health and mental disorders has undergone extensive exploration within the field of psychology, resulting in various models and approaches. In addition to traditional ways like the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, psychologists have proposed alternative perspectives for evaluating mental health. One such innovative approach is the psychosocial health model, which defines mental well-being as sexual, emotional, social, environmental, cognitive, religious, moral, and spiritual satisfaction. This paper presents four consecutive studies aimed at developing and validating a new scale, Sukoon Psychosocial Illness Scale (SPIS), to measure psychosocial illness and its sub-factors based on the model of psychosocial health. SPIS was developed and validated through four sequential studies involving 684 participants. Rigorous exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were employed to establish content and construct validity. Convergent and discriminant validity were assessed by examining associations with psychological distress and overall psychosocial health. Reliability was evaluated using internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and item-total and item-scale correlations. The results of the study confirm the high reliability and validity of SPIS. This refined instrument consists of 21 items presented in English, employing a 7-point Likert scale for responses. The scale comprises six distinct sub-scales, namely emotional problems, sexual problems, religious and moral problems, social problems, spiritual problems, and professional problems. SPIS emerges as a promising tool for future researchers and clinicians, offering a fresh perspective on mental disorders through the comprehensive lens of psychosocial health. This instrument contributes to the evolving landscape of mental health assessment and underscores the importance of considering diverse dimensions for a holistic understanding of psychosocial well-being.

show abstract

“…Nonetheless, this literature remains domain-specific, not showing much interest in examining how gender attitudes relate to attitudes in other domains (Halman and Gelissen, 2019; but see Scarborough et al, 2021 for an exception). In contrast, studies on the new cultural divide, have the ambition to identify the deeper roots of contemporary political conflicts.…”

Section: Gender Relations and Ideologiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Gender Attitudes and the New Cultural Divide in Europe

Schäfer¹,

Khoudja²,

Grunow³

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper investigates how gender attitudes relate to the new cultural divide between cosmopolitans and communitarians in Europe, which is largely defined by immigration and EU attitudes. We examine how gender attitudes vary across this divide, how large and diverse the groups are that hold different combinations of these attitudes, and how these patterns differ between Western Europe and Central and Eastern Europe (CEE). Using data from the European Values Study 2017 (EVS), we conduct a latent profile analysis to investigate the most common of nine possible combinations of attitudes regarding gender, immigration, and the EU. We find different patterns of attitudinal variation across Western Europe and CEE. In Western Europe, we find substantial divisions over gender attitudes across profiles, but not over immigration and EU attitudes. In CEE, we find disagreement over immigration attitudes coupled with centrist EU attitudes and ambivalent gender attitudes that differ gradually across profiles. In both regions, gender attitudes appear to cross-cut attitudes relating to the new cultural divide. Our study reveals how gender attitudes interact with other ideologies within individuals and across regions in Europe. These findings have implications for understanding how socio-cultural values shape political behavior and preferences in Europe.

show abstract

Values in Life Domains in a Cross-National Perspective

Cited by 25 publications

References 42 publications

Civil Society In Civilizational Dimensions

Civil Society In Civilizational Dimensions

Simplifying the Understanding and Measurement of Mental Disorders Thru a Comprehensive Framework of Psychosocial Health

Gender Attitudes and the New Cultural Divide in Europe

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About