Valuing different human lives.

Abstract

Do people think of the value of all human lives as equivalent irrespective of age? Affirmations of the equal value of all human lives are culturally prominent, yet much evidence points to the fact that the young are often prioritized over the old in life-and-death decision-making contexts. Studies 1-3 aimed to reconcile this tension by showing that although individuals are seen as more equal with respect to negative rights not to be harmed or killed (though not completely equal), they are seen as less equal with respect to positive rights to be aided or saved. Age exerts a large and systematic impact on decisions about who to save and about whose death is more tragic, suggesting that individuals are seen as possessing differing amounts of contingent value. These initial studies also yielded the novel finding that, although children are prioritized over adults, older children are often prioritized over younger children. Study 4 replicated this finding with a think-aloud methodology; the study showed that the preference for older children appears to be driven by their having had more invested in their lives, their better developed social relations, and their greater understanding of death. Studies 5a-5c demonstrated the independent causal effects of each of these variables on judgments of life's value. Finally, in Studies 6 and 7, mediation methods were used to show that older children's more meaningful social relations primarily explain the greater value of older than of younger children. These findings have implications for bioethics and medical policy.

Are Children Perceived to Be Morally Exceptional? Different Sets of Psychological Variables Predict Adults’ Moral Judgments About Adults and Young Children

“…Although previous research has suggested that children may have some sort of distinctive status in the moral domain (Anderson & Masicampo, 2017; Goodwin & Landy, 2014; H. M. Gray et al, 2007), these five studies are the first empirical investigation to systematically compare variables that predict moral judgments about adults and young children.…”

“…Human beings make many kinds of moral judgments—including judgments about others’ moral rights and about the moral wrongness of others’ transgressions—and these judgments are influenced by many different psychological variables. With rare exceptions (e.g., Goodwin & Landy, 2014), research on adults’ moral judgments has focused on their judgments about other adults. Little is known about adults’ moral judgments about children.…”

Understanding human – bat interactions in NSW, Australia: improving risk communication for prevention of Australian bat lyssavirus

“…bat scratch) early enough to be given PET for ABLV. There is also a strong cultural value around protecting and supporting the health of more vulnerable individuals or groups (particularly children) in the population [48] which may partly explain the expressed need to educate children about ABLV. These findings are also supported by the recent published study from Young et al [43], whereby the majority of participants in their study (624/700) reported that they would handle a bat to protect their family, children or pets from harm.…”

Morally excused but socially excluded: Denying agency through the defense of mental impairment

“…Moral standing. Four items assessed moral standing (α = .86), adapted from Piazza et al [40] and Goodwin and Landy [39], for example, "Harming Jeff would be morally wrong;" "Jeff deserves to be treated with care and compassion." Social services.…”